Pbc's ppvs, ESPN ppvs are wack. Tyson, DLH and FMJ were ppv kings because everyone wanted to see them fight! This fight, just like the horrible mismatch between spence/mikey and the gift draw/robbery between wilder/fury SHOULD have been free! Both pbc and tr signed lucrative deals but are still forcing ppvs down everyone's throat.
Comments Thread For: Bob Arum: Crawford-Khan Is A Splendid Pay-Per-View Event
Collapse
-
Comment
-
If it is strictly for boxing, then yeah, I can see the logic of unsubscribing from SHO and ESPN+.Comment
-
Not a ppv event for this top wank event
you should pay the public to watch khan (get knocked out again)
the guy is D level at best
proud not to pay for arums crappy espn+
DO NOT BUY THIS RIPOFF MATCH
its just another ridiculous matchup like he did with manny for years getting him wins at catchweights ... manny has since wised up and wont take fights with guys like errol spence at their actual weights. TOP WANK should be the name not TOP RANK LOLComment
-
-
Comment
-
Agreed. Stevenson and Lopez are my two favorite prospects and neither is fighting a tomato can. Khan's speed will be tricky for Crawford at first. Look at the Dulorme, Gamboa, and even Lundy fight. Interested in seeing if Terence starts off southpaw or orthodox.Comment
-
Pbc's ppvs, ESPN ppvs are wack. Tyson, DLH and FMJ were ppv kings because everyone wanted to see them fight! This fight, just like the horrible mismatch between spence/mikey and the gift draw/robbery between wilder/fury SHOULD have been free! Both pbc and tr signed lucrative deals but are still forcing ppvs down everyone's throat.Comment
-
We can *** him over by not buying the fight. Crawford-Khan on PPV would never have happened in the early 2000s. This is bullsht robbery.Comment
-
No this ppv is about as pointless as the Spence vs Garcia fight was. But if people are ****** enough to pay for ***** fights like these then let them.Comment
Comment