PBC smiles: Spence vs Porter on PPV. $75.

[MeanestNiceGuy]

Boxing fans beg for big fights. Big fights get announced, boxing fans complain about the price and don't buy it. Boxing is free on TV. Boxing fans still complain. Boxing fans then claim "boxing is dead".

Dude, who cares what you're willing to spend money on and how do we know if you DIDN'T buy it after all? These threads need to stop.

[KTFOKING]

Spence vs Porter on PPV is going to be interesting. Is Spence at that level after the Mikey fight where it's PPV rest of the way? Would I pay for it if it goes on PPV? Absolutely.

Every US fight for Pacquiao is PPV and I'd buy the Thurman fight as it should be a good one.

[Scipio2009]

From what I'm gathering, PBC is turning into Top Rank. All garbage fights will be free and any half way decent fight that's not even close to being a mega fight will be ppv.

In what would are Harrison-Charlo 2 and Hurd-Williams garbage fights?

Heck, the profile isn't really there but Lipinets-Peterson is a good fight too, lol.

The hate is hilarious

[uppercut510]

these boards have went to complete shts this is geting to be too much

[lizard_man]

Boxing fans beg for big fights. Big fights get announced, boxing fans complain about the price and don't buy it. Boxing is free on TV. Boxing fans still complain. Boxing fans then claim "boxing is dead".

Dude, who cares what you're willing to spend money on and how do we know if you DIDN'T buy it after all? These threads need to stop.

Are you seriously happy to settle? I mean Spence vs mikey should NOT have been on PPV. $75?lmao. Spence vs crawford is a PPV fight. Now they're talking spence vs porter for $75?

Why would I pay $75 for a subpar fight when i can get a real ppv fight in canelo amd jacobs for $10 on dazn.

You should be worried about not getting swindled out of every last dollar they can squeeze out of you just because you're a hardcore fan. **** that. Take a stand and support only the real fights that are worth the money they are charging.

[chaosisme]

The most interesting aspect of Spence vs Porter on PPV for me would be to see how awful the undercard is.

[Rip Chudd]

Nah bro, Porter couldn't sell out a family dinner

[ShoulderRoll]

I would pay $75 for a Pac-Thurman, Spence-Porter double header.

No questions asked.

[KTFOKING]

Are you seriously happy to settle? I mean Spence vs mikey should NOT have been on PPV. $75?lmao. Spence vs crawford is a PPV fight. Now they're talking spence vs porter for $75?

Why would I pay $75 for a subpar fight when i can get a real ppv fight in canelo amd jacobs for $10 on dazn.

You should be worried about not getting swindled out of every last dollar they can squeeze out of you just because you're a hardcore fan. **** that. Take a stand and support only the real fights that are worth the money they are charging.

Very fair perspective right here. Definitely the paying consumer's choice what to purchase or not to purchase. So my question here is, at what point does it become acceptable that Spence is a PPV fighter from here on out? Like at one point Mayweather/Pacquiao were relegated to PPV only and even guys like MAB/EM became primarily PPV fighters. Does this only apply to Spence if he beats Crawford? The numbers he just did vs Garcia were very impressive for it being his PPV debut and it will be interesting to see if either FOX/SHO pony up a big license fee to air his next fight against say Porter on their network and not on PPV. I don't think he is quite at the level of fighting on strictly PPV, but if he beats Porter and then say the winner of Pacquiao/Thurman? Then it would be hard to put him off of PPV.

[Bmore18]

I would pay $75 for a Pac-Thurman, Spence-Porter double header.

No questions asked.

lol you kidding? That be the best PPV card in recent memory right there. Plus since its PBC you could expect a HW KO on the undercard