Who Is The Harder Puncher?

[Verstyle]

oh i never said he "hits" like a *****. peter may "hit" harder than rahman, but he certainly doesnt "punch" harder.

ok isnt that the same thing hit and punch?

[mr. bojangles]

Rahman KOd Lewis and KDd Tua with a jab, he didn't KO or KD Sanders (the ref stopped the fight). Peter, KDd Wlad who was taken out by Sanders and Brewster.

Rahman shoots straight accurate punches, while Peter more wider punches. Dunno who hits harder tho lol

[blockhead]

ok isnt that the same thing hit and punch?

not really, a punch is a calculated and timed precise strike. a hit is a wild fortuitous landed blow. peter is lucky with his hits and rahman is more precise with his punches.

[mr. bojangles]

not really, a punch is a calculated and timed precise strike. a hit is a wild fortuitous landed blow. peter is lucky with his hits and rahman is more precise with his punches.

wtf are u talkin about?

[blockhead]

wtf are u talkin about?

i am talking about the difference between the blows that are landed between rahman and peter. peter throws wild uncontrolled powerful shots, and rahman throws controlled and trained punches. there is a difference. i think rahman is a more powerful puncher because he throws them knowing where they will land while peter throws wild swings that he hopes will land on a valid target. peter can throw his crazy shots all night and miss but rahman strikes at a precice target. thus rahman is a more powerful puncher.

[Boxing4Real]

I'm not necessarily convinced Peter punches harder. Sure, he looks to be the harder puncher when he fights nothing but bums (outside of Wladimir, whom Corrie Sanders demolished in 2). Rahman isn't going to look stronger when he's fighting better competition.

Still, Peter is younger and I understand why anybody would say he hits harder. He's bigger too obviously. He probably hits harder, but I doubt its really that much harder.

[blockhead]

I'm not necessarily convinced Peter punches harder. Sure, he looks to be the harder puncher when he fights nothing but bums (outside of Wladimir, whom Corrie Sanders demolished in 2). Rahman isn't going to look stronger when he's fighting better competition.

Still, Peter is younger and I understand why anybody would say he hits harder. He's bigger too obviously. He probably hits harder, but I doubt its really that much harder.

i think i am expressing myself incorrectly. i thin that peter probably hits harder than rahman but with less control. i think that with a controlled punch rahman can do more damage because he has control of what he is doing and peter does not. therefore in my opinion rahman is the stronger puncher.

[DiegoFuego]

Rahman KOd Lewis and KDd Tua with a jab, he didn't KO or KD Sanders (the ref stopped the fight). Peter, KDd Wlad who was taken out by Sanders and Brewster.

Rahman shoots straight accurate punches, while Peter more wider punches. Dunno who hits harder tho lol

he knocked Sanders down twice actually...floored him. don't talk about fights you haven't seen.

[Boxing4Real]

i think i am expressing myself incorrectly. i thin that peter probably hits harder than rahman but with less control. i think that with a controlled punch rahman can do more damage because he has control of what he is doing and peter does not. therefore in my opinion rahman is the stronger puncher.

I definitely can't argue that. Peter has seemed so far less controlled, no doubt. I think you're meaning Rahman hits his target better than Peter. From what I've seen, I can't dispute that at all.

[mr. bojangles]

i am talking about the difference between the blows that are landed between rahman and peter. peter throws wild uncontrolled powerful shots, and rahman throws controlled and trained punches. there is a difference. i think rahman is a more powerful puncher because he throws them knowing where they will land while peter throws wild swings that he hopes will land on a valid target. peter can throw his crazy shots all night and miss but rahman strikes at a precice target. thus rahman is a more powerful puncher.

that's better. i agree, Rahman's more accurate!