My mistake, I wont use colorful language since it apparently confuses you. I'll spell it out for you. I want Morales to win... not because I particularly like Morales... but because I hate Pacquiao fans more than I hate rabid Latino/Mexican fans.
My statement was colorful. All I meant was that if Pacquiao wins it's not a big deal because it's expected. However, if Morales wins then it's much more damaging to Pacquiao. Morales is old in boxing years and is close to retirement. Getting beaten by a well past Prime Morales while in your prime yourself is simply no good whatsoever.
Is that simple enough or am I going to have to use smaller words and hand gestures or pictures?
I guess you're confusing colorful with hateful. Didn't you're mother taught you manners and the proper/respectful use of the English language?
LOL I sure fooled alot of people into thinking Im a good writer. You should write one and lets see how much better I am than you Maybe you can write something about this picture
so how come morales was well past his prime? just because he was badly ridiculed by pacquiao in their last fight and he barely won over pac in their first fight?
Morales is well past his prime because the weight he fights at is taxing on his body, and the wars he's been through are even more taxing. He's taken so many clean punches from so many hard punchers it simply takes its toll. He's 30 years old and has 52 fights under his belt... that's simply a lot... especially when looking at who he has fought.
Morales is well past his prime because the weight he fights at is taxing on his body, and the wars he's been through are even more taxing. He's taken so many clean punches from so many hard punchers it simply takes its toll. He's 30 years old and has 52 fights under his belt... that's simply a lot... especially when looking at who he has fought.
so... should he have won in their second encounter, he is still in his prime?
Comment