Was never found of Bradley as a fighter, but dear god, as a commentator... Too many blows to the head, then goes to the Teddy Flatface school of sports journalism.
Spence is talented, and so is Mickey, but how does beating a guy who's best win is a damaged Brook and an over the hill Peterson make him P4P best? If he wins, it will be a good victory, even though people will say Spence was overhyped. And if he loses, the same will say he was too small and bit off more than he could chew.
I expect this kind of comment from die hard fans with no perspective, not from a world champion turned commentator. A little nuance would be appreciated!
You're making a Nuance of yourself with that post & opinion on Bradley
It sounds to me like you are hoping neither guy gets credit? I guess if you are a Loma fan, or Canelo or Crawford it would make sense.
If Mikey pulls this off, it will trump everything any other welter has done, because frankly, all the other top guys have blatantly ducked Spence.
The over the hill Peterson you talk about went life and death with Danny Garcia. I thought he won the fight.
Brook was, and is, a top notch fighter that beat Porter, who is one of the top guys at welter. No excuses.
Did you actually read my post? Have you seen Brook's last fight? Have you seen Porter lose to Ugas? Do you really think Peterson beat Garcia? I'm talking about "nuance"... you obviously didn't get it. ... cause you're probably a Bradley fan.
Tweet
Comment