Its obvious you aren't a fan of Golovkin so don't presume to speak for us. You claim to be a boxing savant and you don't even know that all fighters get older their reflexes are compromised and they don't perform as well. That happens to all athletes not just boxers. Do you believe that Micheal Spinks would have beat Larry Holmes when Larry was in his prime. I certainly don't and most reasonable people would conceed this. With you reasonable points are lies and facts are excuses.
Comments Thread For: Golovkin Wants The Best at 160 - With Or Without The Belts
Collapse
-
Comment
-
Always good to see that GGG even at his age is still one of the most relevant fighters on this forum.
Look how he handles Malik Scott, one of Wilders opponents.
#GGGTAKEOVER @GGGBoxing Wasting No Time in Camp This Week Showing Who's The Boss!! @TomLoeffler1 pic.twitter.com/fkkfaMQhwg
— Bernie Bahrmasel (@BernieBahrmasel) March 23, 2019
Comment
-
I am a boxing fan, I don't score fights the first time I watch them
I put my pen/paper down about 40 years ago kid, around about the same time I learned how to score a fight
adding up jabs is a fools errand when it comes to professional boxing, I can clearly see how a fight is unfoldingComment
-
-
Did you watch the Spence Garcia fight. Spence won that fight by establishing distance. He used the jab to do it. Once that was in place he opened up and dominated Garcia. So don't pretend to be a boxing guru when you have no idea how the jab can be a pivotal factor in a boxing match.
son.....
I get the first part..... jabbing
the 2nd part..... using that jab to control distance, establish the perimeter, and setup better combinations..... like Spence did.....
..... but when did that happen with Golovkin ?
b,b,b,b,but.....
Spence won that fight because his jab was effective, and he built from there..... Golovkin simply did not.....
landing a few pushed pitty-pat jabs is not how you win a professional boxing match
which is why Sanchez admitted that Golovkin did not winComment
-
Lol yup on your last point. People aren't consistent. I'm not going to hate on GGG cuz at least he's being honest with his intentions. And I can see why he'd want to go that route. Regardless, the big fights are going to involve titles anyway. He just won't directly be aiming at capturing titles but will indirectly get there.Comment
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
Chavez was a weird fighter and not very good. But he was always a big draw, and will always have that KO over Andy Lee on his resume, to his credit.
Murray though, for one, is/was clearly a better fighter than Chavez. For partial evidence see how Murray did vs Martinez compared to how Chavez did. Murray probably should have won while Chavez probably won one round.Comment
Comment