so let me get this straight, you'd prefer that he chase a paper champion like a Rocky fielding or a Liam Smith for example and say he's "chasing greatness" , than to face the fighters that might be considered the best in the division even if they don't have a belt?? At mw, charlo doesn't have a belt, Saunders doesn't have a belt, ggg himself doesn't have a belt, after may, either Canelo or Jacob's likely won't have a title. So in many instances, it's safe to say that some of the best fighters in a division don't have a belt. Especially if they got their belt vs a low level opponent or by a controversial decision. Looks like you're reaching to try to find something to criticize when the actual title of the article is he wants to fight the best in his division.
Comments Thread For: Golovkin Wants The Best at 160 - With Or Without The Belts
Collapse
-
-
GGG would’ve been undisputed Champion with all the belts. Canelo would’ve been forced to concede with 50/50.
In fact if GGG had all the belts after beating Saunders they could’ve stayed defending and toppling Hopkins’ record while making Canelo wait and still giving step asides to any mandatories, THEN fight Canelo. By that time HBO would’ve been gone and the networks would’ve been wanting GGG today, no different. DAZN was already in motion in Europe before it hit the USA.
Point is, GGG would’ve been A side king and making more than his choices of ditching BJS in Astana and then going to Canelo. GBP can’t be blamed for that. Loeffler and GGG are grown men.Last edited by Thuglife Nelo; 03-12-2019, 09:51 AM.Comment
-
Lol. Prime Canelo is here. Golovkin was fighting Tapia at Canelo’s age. These comparisons only show you feel hurt and bring GBP’s road path.so let me get this straight, you'd prefer that he chase a paper champion like a Rocky fielding or a Liam Smith for example and say he's "chasing greatness" , than to face the fighters that might be considered the best in the division even if they don't have a belt?? At mw, charlo doesn't have a belt, Saunders doesn't have a belt, ggg himself doesn't have a belt, after may, either Canelo or Jacob's likely won't have a title. So in many instances, it's safe to say that some of the best fighters in a division don't have a belt. Especially if they got their belt vs a low level opponent or by a controversial decision. Looks like you're reaching to try to find something to criticize when the actual title of the article is he wants to fight the best in his division.
I like GGG, I begged everyone to make noise for him to be champ at 168 over at PBC and still make great money. Apparently you don’t like PBC. It’s fun to make fun of PBC shillery and DAZN shillery, but it requires a master like me to show you the light of way.Comment
-
1st of all Charlo has a belt,Brant has a belt,Andrade has a belt,they have jr/gifted belts but then again so did ggg when he was counting them as title defenses despite being jr/vacant belt(s). Are you truly naive enough to not only think ggg doesn't consider them belts, but to also think that if he was intending to fight those opponents that he wouldn't be touting them as champion opponents?why would he have went through all the trouble of making excuses if he was facing 1 of them?so let me get this straight, you'd prefer that he chase a paper champion like a Rocky fielding or a Liam Smith for example and say he's "chasing greatness" , than to face the fighters that might be considered the best in the division even if they don't have a belt?? At mw, charlo doesn't have a belt, Saunders doesn't have a belt, ggg himself doesn't have a belt, after may, either Canelo or Jacob's likely won't have a title. So in many instances, it's safe to say that some of the best fighters in a division don't have a belt. Especially if they got their belt vs a low level opponent or by a controversial decision. Looks like you're reaching to try to find something to criticize when the actual title of the article is he wants to fight the best in his division.
Those fighters are the best possible opponents he can face if hes serious of" intending to face only who'll help his legacy facing true champs regardless of having belts or not".
How much do you want to bet that ggg faces a can next instead of 1 of the 3 mw beltholders or a beltholder at 168? You sound to be already making excuses 4 gggs next cherrypick/duck & once again going against everything you said about ginger before.Comment
-
Deryevchenko would've beat his ass. That's why he DUCKED him to keep the canelo rematch alive. That's why your dumba$$ got robbed by canelo(like everyone does). Karma dumb dumb.
Now go on and lineup your next bum before a third fight with cinnamon that no one wants to see. You're not fooling real boxing fans
Comment
-
That's what he said:
.@GGGBoxing speaks on the importance of a third fight with @canelo 🗣️💥 pic.twitter.com/UC7YDwWe7V
— DAZN USA (@DAZN_USA) March 12, 2019
Comment
-
Sergei D wouldn't have been a threat to GGG. Speed is what troubles GGG. The difference in speed is what made the Jacobs and Canelo fights so difficult. That isn't what Sergei D brought to the table.Deryevchenko would've beat his ass. That's why he DUCKED him to keep the canelo rematch alive. That's why your dumba$$ got robbed by canelo(like everyone does). Karma dumb dumb.
Now go on and lineup your next bum before a third fight with cinnamon that no one wants to see. You're not fooling real boxing fans
Comment
-
Comment
-
Lol yup
First it was about having all the belts so he went on his bum of the month campaign now all of a sudden he wants the best fighters only yet turned down fights with the other top guys lolComment
Comment