Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Dillian Whyte's Deal With Top Rank & ESPN Nearing Completion

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by Laligalaliga View Post
    Whyte/browne was a final eliminator. why is he sueing them if they (sualiman) didn't break his promise?

    Whyte is not a mad man to be taking legal charges with a case to make.

    Do you make use of your brains at all or you just pretend to be ******.
    Share a source of Whyte-Browne being a final eliminator, lol

    Comment


    • Originally posted by Jkp View Post
      The stadiums were empty when wilder fought bums,
      The stadiums are full when AJ fights bums.

      Wilder has just fought the 2 toughest guys in division, and american and global fan base has responded accordingly and started to support him.

      AJ still cherry picking bums, because UK fanboys are gullible and will still go watch him.

      Hahahahaha..... Fighting one decent guy and another guy that can't punch in 42 fights is fighting the toughest guys in the division.

      Lolx.... Now I understand why you guys are been brainwashed and ripped off.

      I can see why he never attempted to unify.

      Comment


      • Originally posted by Scipio2009 View Post
        Share a source of Whyte-Browne being a final eliminator, lol
        please stop all this pretence.... it's not good for the sport.

        Comment


        • Originally posted by Jax teller View Post
          You do realise if Breazeale v Molina was a final eliminator they gave Molina the opportunity after losing to AJ and getting an MD in a 6 rounder against a guy who has 44 losses and 14 wins. (Molina also lost to Wilder 2 fights before AJ)


          Whytes claim has 10 times more worth even if it is Browne.
          I believe what the WBC has said is that it was only a final eliminator for Breazeale. Had Molina won, it would have been treated as a semi-final eliminator. Maybe that's where the confusion came from.

          I don't think Whyte would have any luck suing to become mandatory, but he might find some success if he demands to be able to face the highest available contender for the interim title. He was promised an interim title fight, so he might be entitled to one legally if he pushes the issue, but if he just demands to be automatically named the mandatory, I don't think he'll be successful.

          Whyte is exciting and I'd love to see him against the Wilder vs. Breazeale winner, but he'll probably have to fight a final eliminator to become mandatory. Whyte vs. Ortiz for the interim title would be a great fight and honestly I don't think Ortiz deserves another title shot yet. The Whyte vs. Ortiz winner would definitely deserve a shot though.

          Comment


          • Originally posted by Laligalaliga View Post
            please stop all this pretence.... it's not good for the sport.
            I'll fix this for you. You can't find a source because there is no such source.

            Admit it and move on

            Comment


            • A lot interesting developments at heavyweight recently.

              Comment


              • Comment


                • Originally posted by Mammoth View Post
                  LOL, he quickly put that pen away. Just needs to hold tight and get ensured hes guaranteed first crack at the undisputed.

                  Comment

                  Working...
                  X
                  TOP