I seen the vid on your profile on Mayweather..love it.
Many said Marquez over hill v him...then he sparked pacman...gave Bradley imo a defeat ....but over hill fighting Mayweather to haters.....
Like when Calzaghe schooled Hopkins.....haters say Hopkins over hill...then Hopkins wins a title later...alongside Calzaghe v Eubank.......Eubank too old....
My point mate and you are **** on regarding the Brook is shot comment...is when Calzaghe made Eubank look crap....Eubank was not 43 like Hopkins....who I add later won a title proving he was not shot....past very best yes....shot nope...Eubank was 31......in prime.....and in the era of the slugger he did well.....Calzaghe would have punched his head off same if he was 25....31 and folk say Eubank shot?.....like they say both Marquez and cotto were.....ignoring the fact marquez then knocked pacman spark out and coto was a weight increase for Floyd?Then ignoring Mayweather age ...still beating all like Calzaghe???????....age aint a reason at 31...excuse is.
My point tonight is people will add excuses for great boxers....facts do not need excused....Mayweather by FAR...best ever....Calzaghe by far best British ever...
People forget Calzaghe and Floyd age still winning then offer excuses for guys at 31 doing chit v them......does not stack up...mint to see ya video on profile..made me smile.
Comment