Better resume Wilder or Fury?

[THEFRESHBRAWLER]

And this is why saline ********s exist. Shame they missed you.


Why post on a Boxing Forum ifyou don't know Boxing? ISn't MArch Madness about to heat up?

Get your rep up before you speak to me nerd

[N/A]

That has nothing to do with resume lmaooo. That’s ONE fight. Who has he beat that’s so special besides Klitschko. Can anyone answer that

wilder has faced better competition, but which is why he's higher in the boxrec ratings, but being wba/ibf/wbo/lineal champion looks better on a resume than just being wbc champion.

[THEFRESHBRAWLER]

wilder has faced better competition, but which is why he's higher in the boxrec ratings, but being wba/ibf/wbo/lineal champion looks better on a resume than just being wbc champion.

So you do agree that Floyd is the g.o.a.t?


Fury is the first fighter I’ve seen get credit for beating a 40yr old. All Mayweather opponents were too old for him and they were younger than Klitschko. Interesting.

[chrisJS]

Fury’s by far. He has a head-to-head win and he dethroned Klitschko who hadn’t lost in about a decade and Wilders team admitted to ducking Wlad.

Wilder has one decent win in Ortiz but after that he doesn’t even have a Cunningham, Chisora or guys that good.

Fury by landslide.

[Rusty Tromboni]

Get your rep up before you speak to me nerd

Looks like all the time you spend sitting in front of the computer has left you w/ hemorrhoids. AMybe you're not normally so easily triggered? Either way, I'm sorry I have too much of a life in the real world to have the "thread cred" you carry.

Something about women not finding me repulsive might have something to do with it... Or maybe if you would actually do your chores mom and boyfriend-of-the-month wouldn't have you grounded in your room.

Well, maybe someday I'll have a life as sad as yours, and my thousands of posts will finally be more important to you than logic and facts.

One can only hope.

[N/A]

So you do agree that Floyd is the g.o.a.t?

i dont like to comment on fighters from before my time, but in the 30+ years ive closely followed boxing, floyd is #1 p4p for sure.

[Rusty Tromboni]

Fury’s by far. He has a head-to-head win and he dethroned Klitschko who hadn’t lost in about a decade and Wilders team admitted to ducking Wlad.

Wilder has one decent win in Ortiz but after that he doesn’t even have a Cunningham, Chisora or guys that good.

Fury by landslide.

End. Of. Thread.

[Rusty Tromboni]

i dont like to comment on fighters from before my time, but in the 30+ years ive closely followed boxing, floyd is #1 p4p for sure.

There's a guy named Lomachenko. you should check him out.

As for Floyd being ranked any where. I'm guessing you haven't seen the Castillo fights... please don't if you don't want your bubble burst.

[DreamFighter]

No it just lets me know how biased boxing fans are. AJ resume is better and if Povetkin wouldn’t have cheated like Fury Wilder would have the better resume

i'd never assume the result of a fight, if i were you, it shows u r very biased.

[N/A]

There's a guy named Lomachenko. you should check him out.

As for Floyd being ranked any where. I'm guessing you haven't seen the Castillo fights... please don't if you don't want your bubble burst.

when lomachenko retires, he'll be judged appropriately. he's already lost, so it'll be tough for him to match mayweather.

of course i've seen the castillo fights and i was on press row for the first one.

like most fights, fans think whoever hbo says won is who won, but many top experts had floyd eeking out a close win. the rematch was a pretty clear win for floyd.