Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: WBC Prez: We 100% Support Wilder, We'll Rule on Breazeale

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #11
    The WBC should order a Braezaele mandatory and RE-ORDER a Whyte-Ortiz fight for the interim title. That way the winner of Wilder-Joshua will eventually be mandated to fight the winner of Whyte-Ortiz after the dust settles, in addition to the WBA, WBO and IBF mandatories. Or the winner drops the belt and the interim belt holder becomes the new WBC champion.

    Comment


    • #12
      The fact that Dillian Whyte has been the #1 contender in the WBC for so long, winning title eliminators and assorted WBC titles yet not getting a shot at Wilder is proof positive that the Wilder protection agency is in full force.

      Comment


      • #13
        Originally posted by theface07 View Post
        The fact that Dillian Whyte has been the #1 contender in the WBC for so long, winning title eliminators and assorted WBC titles yet not getting a shot at Wilder is proof positive that the Wilder protection agency is in full force.
        You’re making **** up. Whyte has never been #1 contender and never fought any eliminators. He’s got the silver belt, that’s it.

        Comment


        • #14
          Originally posted by _Rexy_ View Post
          You’re making **** up. Whyte has never been #1 contender and never fought any eliminators. He’s got the silver belt, that’s it.
          all I know was whyte /browne was announced a final eliminator and sualiman did his snake dance and gave it to Breazeale.

          I expected him to order whyte/Breazeale, winner to be mandated to take on wilder.

          This settles all the side murmous.

          Comment


          • #15
            Originally posted by _Rexy_ View Post
            You’re making **** up. Whyte has never been #1 contender and never fought any eliminators. He’s got the silver belt, that’s it.
            None of this is true.

            Whyte has been ranked 1 for awhile now and hes had at least one elimination bout, maybe two ?

            Why do the posters who always tell others they make things up, always don't even check what they are saying themselves ?

            Comment


            • #16
              Theres a few things wrong here. Just because the WBC mandated fights doesn't mean Wilders fought a mandatory. Fury was not the mandatory. Breazeale said he will not agree to the Whyte fight if the fury fight falls through and it has. sounds like they will try and keep another 6'7 puncher away from wilder and protect Wilder again .

              Breazeale needs to take legal action soon ,its getting absurd. His win over Izu alone should get him a shot already, that's a guy they surely didn't let Wilder fight on the same card he fought Washington, they fed him to Breazeale and it backfired on them after he signed a very luctrative deal with Haymon. Ha

              Comment


              • #17
                Originally posted by davefromvancouv View Post
                The WBC should order a Braezaele mandatory and RE-ORDER a Whyte-Ortiz fight for the interim title. That way the winner of Wilder-Joshua will eventually be mandated to fight the winner of Whyte-Ortiz after the dust settles, in addition to the WBA, WBO and IBF mandatories. Or the winner drops the belt and the interim belt holder becomes the new WBC champion.
                No need for an interim title. The WBC should just make a decision. Flip a coin Whyte or Breazeale with the loser fighting Ortiz in a final eliminator!

                Comment


                • #18
                  I've been saying for a while that Wilder and Breazeale should be fighting. Not because Breazeale is a mandatory but because of all the beef between them.

                  It will be an entertaining fight and if it got made, it would give me a slither of respect for Wilder for taking on another decent fighter as an alternative. You know, like how Joshua has done with Miller.

                  Not one rule for one and one rule for another.

                  Originally posted by davefromvancouv View Post
                  The WBC should order a Braezaele mandatory and RE-ORDER a Whyte-Ortiz fight for the interim title. That way the winner of Wilder-Joshua will eventually be mandated to fight the winner of Whyte-Ortiz after the dust settles, in addition to the WBA, WBO and IBF mandatories. Or the winner drops the belt and the interim belt holder becomes the new WBC champion.
                  Also this ^^^^

                  Comment


                  • #19
                    Originally posted by theface07 View Post
                    The fact that Dillian Whyte has been the #1 contender in the WBC for so long, winning title eliminators and assorted WBC titles yet not getting a shot at Wilder is proof positive that the Wilder protection agency is in full force.
                    The wilderettes dont want deontayduckus anywhere near The Villain Whyte and WeBeCorrupt (WBC) has been in cahoots with Protecting Boxing Cowards .....its easy to see the corruption in the WBC.....

                    Comment


                    • #20
                      Originally posted by theface07 View Post
                      The fact that Dillian Whyte has been the #1 contender in the WBC for so long, winning title eliminators and assorted WBC titles yet not getting a shot at Wilder is proof positive that the Wilder protection agency is in full force.
                      I will be honest.. Whyte should stay away from Wilder.. Whyte might die in the ring.. Wilder will catch a body vs Whyte.. its a reason Whyte as got his shot.. an he should thank god for more time on this earth. Like the chinese say " Beware what you wish for"

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP