Somehow the IBF is the most legit title in boxing

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • paulf
    Undisputed Champion
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Sep 2009
    • 23737
    • 3,338
    • 2,100
    • 1,052,140

    #11
    The other sanctioning bodies haven't had their offices raided by the FBI like the IBF has. They've been pretty good about sticking to their rules since then.

    Comment

    • lfc19titles
      Undisputed Champion
      • Mar 2010
      • 8731
      • 725
      • 628
      • 94,838

      #12
      ****** thread by a ****** poster

      Comment

      • Laligalaliga
        Undisputed Champion
        Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
        • Mar 2018
        • 6439
        • 71
        • 11
        • 90,109

        #13
        Originally posted by soul_survivor
        Maybe it is the most legit currently... But that doesn't meant it is that much better than the rest. It just happens to be the best of the worst.
        that makes it the best. it's that simple.

        Comment

        • Laligalaliga
          Undisputed Champion
          Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
          • Mar 2018
          • 6439
          • 71
          • 11
          • 90,109

          #14
          Originally posted by lfc19titles
          ****** thread by a ****** poster
          I know you don't like this. it hurt your ego. you love where things can be easily manipulated.

          Comment

          • boliodogs
            Undisputed Champion
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • May 2008
            • 33358
            • 824
            • 1,782
            • 309,589

            #15
            Yes they probably are now the best and most honest of a sorry bunch of alphabet groups.

            Comment

            • N/A
              Undisputed Champion
              Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
              • Jul 2017
              • 9269
              • 214
              • 0
              • 12

              #16
              WBA - Most corrupt by far. Should have lost recognition the second they introduced the super titles in 2001. A completely bogus organization at this point.

              WBC - Caters to the stars. Puts facilitating big fights in front of being fair to all. Which is often good for the fans, but not good for fighters struggling for an opportunity.

              IBF - Doesn't cater to anybody. Stars and fighters struggling for an opportunity are treated as equals. Which is often bad for the fans, but at least it's fair.

              WBO - In house Arum/Warren belt. Not a real world title. Literally founded by the man banished by the WBA for operating a bribery ring.

              Comment

              • The D3vil
                WBA/WBC/WBO/IBF/Lineal
                Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                • Mar 2016
                • 6308
                • 1,608
                • 1,406
                • 56,286

                #17
                I know it's crazy.

                I spent my whole life chuckling at the IBF and now they're like somewhat honest

                Comment

                • paulf
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • Sep 2009
                  • 23737
                  • 3,338
                  • 2,100
                  • 1,052,140

                  #18
                  Originally posted by WBC WBA IBF
                  WBA - Most corrupt by far. Should have lost recognition the second they introduced the super titles in 2001. A completely bogus organization at this point.

                  WBC - Caters to the stars. Puts facilitating big fights in front of being fair to all. Which is often good for the fans, but not good for fighters struggling for an opportunity.

                  IBF - Doesn't cater to anybody. Stars and fighters struggling for an opportunity are treated as equals. Which is often bad for the fans, but at least it's fair.

                  WBO - In house Arum/Warren belt. Not a real world title. Literally founded by the man banished by the WBA for operating a bribery ring.
                  Good post, I agree with all of this. Since the IBF got raided by the FBI they've been pretty good about sticking to their own rules. I wish ESPN, Yahoo, etc would start referring to any WBA champs and junior/minor title holders, if at all.

                  Comment

                  • Beercules
                    Lounge POTY '17
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • Aug 2013
                    • 65186
                    • 4,940
                    • 7,203
                    • 950,179

                    #19
                    Agreed.



                    Always liked the way the IBF belt looked anyway, my favorite looking belt

                    Comment

                    • HeadBodyBodyBody
                      Undisputed Champion
                      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                      • Dec 2013
                      • 2183
                      • 214
                      • 424
                      • 290,342

                      #20
                      To be fair, I was impressed when Jacobs missed the second weigh-in against GGG, and IBF removed the belt from play. Rules are rules

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP