Comments Thread For: WBC Prez Smiles: Spence-Garcia Will Have Diamond Belt at Stake

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • N/A
    Undisputed Champion
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • Jul 2017
    • 9269
    • 214
    • 0
    • 12

    #71
    Originally posted by killakali
    mendoza said they needed titles for their tv deals.

    I’m glad u admit u were wrong in that I never said interim.
    I never said YOU said interim, I was discussing interim and then you brought up unrelated things to confuse the community. Common troll tactic, arguing against things nobody said.

    Mendoza never said PBC needed titles for their TV deals. Mendoza said the WBA is pressured by promoters to sanction titles as networks want titles, but that's been going on for sixty years. That's nothing new and has nothing to do with Haymon. You're just making things up.

    Comment

    • killakali
      Undisputed Champion
      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
      • Oct 2010
      • 7197
      • 226
      • 171
      • 87,195

      #72
      Originally posted by WBC WBA IBF
      I never said YOU said interim, I was discussing interim and then you brought up unrelated things to confuse the community. Common troll tactic, arguing against things nobody said.

      Mendoza never said PBC needed titles for their TV deals. Mendoza said the WBA is pressured by promoters to sanction titles as networks want titles, but that's been going on for sixty years. That's nothing new and has nothing to do with Haymon. You're just making things up.
      it has everything to Do With haymon. Don’t play ******. How many fake titles did top rank have the wba make? How about golden boy on DAZN ? Ok then. Case closed.

      Haymon país to make browne Jack for a fake title same way he did davis vs cuellar. No need for you to lie.

      Comment

      • N/A
        Undisputed Champion
        Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
        • Jul 2017
        • 9269
        • 214
        • 0
        • 12

        #73
        Originally posted by killakali
        How many fake titles did top rank have the wba make?
        Beyond rare exceptions, Top Rank only does business with the WBO. Every single WBO title is a fake title.


        How about golden boy on DAZN ? Ok then. Case closed.
        Golden Boy just started on DAZN and it doesn't get much faker than that super middleweight title Canelo just won. But Golden Boy is also the company that kept getting those interim WBA belts for King Kong Ortiz, begged the WBA to sanction Lucas Matthysse vs Tewa Kiram for the "regular" welterweight title, etc.

        So not only are you blaming Haymon for something all the WBA promoters & managers do, but you're claiming he's using "bribery" despite having no evidence whatsoever. You completely made that up.

        Comment

        • SHOOTALLCLOWNS
          Interim Champion
          Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
          • Nov 2018
          • 621
          • 20
          • 4
          • 14,984

          #74
          Originally posted by WBC WBA IBF
          Beyond rare exceptions, Top Rank only does business with the WBO. Every single WBO title is a fake title.




          Golden Boy just started on DAZN and it doesn't get much faker than that super middleweight title Canelo just won. But Golden Boy is also the company that kept getting those interim WBA belts for King Kong Ortiz, begged the WBA to sanction Lucas Matthysse vs Tewa Kiram for the "regular" welterweight title, etc.

          So not only are you blaming Haymon for something all the WBA promoters & managers do, but you're claiming he's using "bribery" despite having no evidence whatsoever. You completely made that up.
          wbo isn't fake just because gaymon can't bribe or have his way with them doesn't make them fake. they are legit! stop spreading fake news.

          Comment

          • N/A
            Undisputed Champion
            Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
            • Jul 2017
            • 9269
            • 214
            • 0
            • 12

            #75
            Originally posted by SHOOTALLCLOWNS
            wbo isn't fake just because gaymon can't bribe or have his way with them doesn't make them fake. they are legit! stop spreading fake news.
            For those of us old enough to remember the creation of the WBO, as well as the decade that followed where nobody gave the title any credence other than the British, it's never going to be taken as seriously as the original three.

            Since you're probably too young to be aware, Bob Arum went public in Ring Magazine and admitted he'd been bribing the WBA for years, buying rankings and titles. He outed, by name, the person he paid all of the bribe money to. Arum did this because he was mad that Don King started paying bigger bribes and Arum didn't have a monopoly on WBA titles anymore.

            The disgraced leader of the WBA bribery ring, who had been publicly outed by Arum, was banished by the WBA forever.

            That man, Pepe Cordero, created the WBO. So the WBO was literally founded by the man Arum exposed for being the leader of the WBA's bribery operation.

            Comment

            • killakali
              Undisputed Champion
              Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
              • Oct 2010
              • 7197
              • 226
              • 171
              • 87,195

              #76
              Originally posted by WBC WBA IBF
              Beyond rare exceptions, Top Rank only does business with the WBO. Every single WBO title is a fake title.




              Golden Boy just started on DAZN and it doesn't get much faker than that super middleweight title Canelo just won. But Golden Boy is also the company that kept getting those interim WBA belts for King Kong Ortiz, begged the WBA to sanction Lucas Matthysse vs Tewa Kiram for the "regular" welterweight title, etc.

              So not only are you blaming Haymon for something all the WBA promoters & managers do, but you're claiming he's using "bribery" despite having no evidence whatsoever. You completely made that up.
              that fake title that Canelo won already existed before Canelo even thought about moving up to 168.

              Top Rank last I checked has the wba 135 and the wbc 140 and also the WBC and IBF 175 plus they control the IBF 135 so that’s anthother false statement by you. Stop the lies. No one takes you serisoulsy anyway and the. You lie like this.

              We must also not forget the bribe Haymon is paying to make Barthelemy vs Robert Easter for a fake interim wba lightweight title that isn’t necessary except that haymons tv deal requires the main event to have a title (even a fake one).

              Good try though.

              Comment

              • N/A
                Undisputed Champion
                Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                • Jul 2017
                • 9269
                • 214
                • 0
                • 12

                #77
                Originally posted by killakali
                that fake title that Canelo won already existed before Canelo even thought about moving up to 168.
                When Fielding fought Zeuge for that title, what was Al Haymon's involvement exactly? Who forced Golden Boy to target Fielding for that title? Who is forcing Canelo to keep the title? Where is Haymon in any of this?


                Top Rank last I checked has the wba 135 and the wbc 140 and also the WBC and IBF 175 plus they control the IBF 135 so that’s anthother false statement by you.
                90+% of Top Rank's title fights the last 10+ years have been WBO. Any involvement with other organizations is the exception.


                We must also not forget the bribe Haymon is paying to make Barthelemy vs Robert Easter for a fake interim wba lightweight title that isn’t necessary except that haymons tv deal requires the main event to have a title (even a fake one).
                You have no evidence Haymon is paying bribes. You're pulling that accusation out of your ass. Arum has admitted to paying the WBA and IBF bribes over the years and the WBO was founded by the guy Arum was paying all his WBA bribes to.

                You have no evidence that Haymon's TV deal requires the main event to have a title. Haymon has more champions than anybody. If he keeps his fighters active, most main events will be for a world title.

                If Barthelemy and Easter fight, it won't be for an interim title. The WBA world title is vacant. #1 is fighting the super champion, so if #2 and #3 fight each other, the WBA will likely fill the vacancy with that fight.

                Comment

                • killakali
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                  • Oct 2010
                  • 7197
                  • 226
                  • 171
                  • 87,195

                  #78
                  Originally posted by WBC WBA IBF
                  When Fielding fought Zeuge for that title, what was Al Haymon's involvement exactly? Who forced Golden Boy to target Fielding for that title? Who is forcing Canelo to keep the title? Where is Haymon in any of this?




                  90+% of Top Rank's title fights the last 10+ years have been WBO. Any involvement with other organizations is the exception.




                  You have no evidence Haymon is paying bribes. You're pulling that accusation out of your ass. Arum has admitted to paying the WBA and IBF bribes over the years and the WBO was founded by the guy Arum was paying all his WBA bribes to.

                  You have no evidence that Haymon's TV deal requires the main event to have a title. Haymon has more champions than anybody. If he keeps his fighters active, most main events will be for a world title.

                  If Barthelemy and Easter fight, it won't be for an interim title. The WBA world title is vacant. #1 is fighting the super champion, so if #2 and #3 fight each other, the WBA will likely fill the vacancy with that fight.
                  nope lomachenko has the wba lightweight title. There is no need for another title there. Except if the bribe is big enough.

                  I mentioned 5 titles that top rank controls right now that are legitimate titles and not interim or a wba regular title. Those arent WBO. Time for You to retract your lies.

                  Comment

                  • N/A
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                    • Jul 2017
                    • 9269
                    • 214
                    • 0
                    • 12

                    #79
                    Originally posted by killakali
                    lomachenko has the wba lightweight title. There is no need for another title there. Except if the bribe is big enough.
                    Lomachenko has the Super title. The World title is vacant. Easter would be fighting for the World title, not the interim title.

                    You have no evidence bribery is involved. The WBA has Super titles and World titles. It's been this way for almost 20 years. If Haymon's fighters weren't fighting for the vacant World title, somebody else's fighters would be. Matchroom, Golden Boy and plenty of others have had WBA World champions in divisions that have Super champions. Nothing unique to Haymon. Shows your bias that you claim he's "bribing," but you don't lob the same accusation at Hearn or De La Hoya.


                    I mentioned 5 titles that top rank controls right now that are legitimate titles and not interim or a wba regular title.
                    Doesn't change the fact that Top Rank has been 90% WBO for many many years.

                    Comment

                    • N/A
                      Undisputed Champion
                      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                      • Jul 2017
                      • 9269
                      • 214
                      • 0
                      • 12

                      #80
                      Originally posted by killakali
                      nope lomachenko has the wba lightweight title. There is no need for another title there. Except if the bribe is big enough.
                      So is Top Rank bribing the WBA since there is now a WBA gold lightweight title fight on Top Rank's April pay-per-view?

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP