Originally posted by JWHardin
View Post
Whether or not the cards were close, he won those fights and the judges correctly gave him the fights regardless.
I'm not even disagreeing that some of those scorecards were absurd. The judge that had Canelo winning by a landslide in the first GGG fight for example, terrible score. The judge that had him up vs Khan 4 rounds to 1, terrible score. The cotto fight was like 8-4 imo, 9-3 wasn't a terrible scorecard. The judge that had him winning 6 rounds vs Mayweather, also an attrocious scorecard. The Lara fight was close could've gone either way, on first watch live I had Lara then I rewatched and saw it for Canelo. Close fight. Trout fight wasn't as close as many make it seem though in my humble opinion.
My point is: He rightfully won all of those fights except for the Mayweather fight regardless. Until the judges GENUINELY and blindly rob someone of a decision against Canelo which hasn't happened yet, we can't claim that it has happened.
Comment