Comments Thread For: Golovkin Sues Managers, Hermann Brothers, For $3.5 Milllion

[Lomadeaux]

Stop crying

He lost the second fight against Canelo without a doubt

Gotta grow up, son.

[Boxing-1013]

Aren't DAZN offering him like 40 million or something to sign with them? Compared to that 3.5 mil is just chump change.

What is seemingly happening is GGG is trying to stop them from capitalizing on GGG's name/trademark. They seem to have been using that to make side money.

[ironfriend]

I'm sure he'll fare in court pretty well.

Man it's such a travesty seeing that 1-1 on his record. Just makes you want to throw up thinking about the corruption in boxing.

His record makes you sick because in your mind you made him unbeatable. Even so at some point you acknowledge the truth and move on. Other wise you are sick, but not in your stomach.

[Lomadeaux]

His record makes you sick because in your mind you made him unbeatable. Even so at some point you acknowledge the truth and move on. Other wise you are sick, but not in your stomach.

I think two years ago at 160 Floyd would have beat him. I'm not a super fan of GGG.

Anyone with a brain who watched both of those fights and saw both of those outcomes... it makes them sick.

Wake up and stop being a troll.

[Level37scythe]

Which bit of the bolded statement are you contesting? Are you saying that it wasn't a majority decision or simply revealing to the world that you don't understand the meaning of the word 'debatable'?

I stated that ggg-canelo 2 was a clear victory for canelo. Nothing debatable about the majority decision except by those "watch the may-pac fight in slow mo to see him win" nut jobs. Reading comprehension. Look it up.

[Level37scythe]

Your personal thoughts on the decisiveness of Canelo's victory in the second go are utterly irrelevant to the fact that the decisions in both matches were highly controversial, as evidenced by the deluge of nearly-unavoidable and still persisting controversy that gushed from every corner of the internet in the immediate wake of both fights. Simply accurately conveying that state of affairs, which is objectively true and not up for debate, does not in of itself convey bias on the writer's behalf, nor does it necessarily even reveal his own personal thoughts on the matter, which may in fact align with your own. If you were slightly more intelligent and slightly less of a mindless Canelo ****rider ******, you wouldn't need to have this explained to you.

Clean lil g's spunk from your eyes, it's blinding you.

Fact. Canelo backed up lil g all night.
Fact. Lil g was mostly just throwing out the jab.
Fact. It was only the 2nd time in canelo's career fighting at 160.

Although I will agree with you that ggg-canelo 1 was controversial and i personally had ggg winning that fight, the 2nd fight was a clear victory for canelo, and all the "controversy that gushed from every corner of the internet in the immediate wake of both fights" is a half truth. 1st fight, everyone including canelo fans were questioning the decision. 2nd fight, only lil g fangirls like yourself were crying like b i t c hes about the decision. Must've felt bad. Watching the bully run like a girl. Go suck on a bottle pus.

[Sweet Scions]

Clean lil g's spunk from your eyes, it's blinding you.

Fact. Canelo backed up lil g all night.
Fact. Lil g was mostly just throwing out the jab.
Fact. It was only the 2nd time in canelo's career fighting at 160.

Although I will agree with you that ggg-canelo 1 was controversial and i personally had ggg winning that fight, the 2nd fight was a clear victory for canelo, and all the "controversy that gushed from every corner of the internet in the immediate wake of both fights" is a half truth. 1st fight, everyone including canelo fans were questioning the decision. 2nd fight, only lil g fangirls like yourself were crying like b i t c hes about the decision. Must've felt bad. Watching the bully run like a girl. Go suck on a bottle pus.

Oh that's cute. The simpering infant calling for a way to block all output from a particular journalist for merely describing the reception to a pair of consecutive fights accurately and objectively is telling me to a suck a bottle. See, this is what happens when you make baseless assumptions. I, like you, thought Canelo won the secon fight soundly. That doesn't make its general reception any less controversial (every bit as controversial as the first whether you or like it or not) or your reaction any less ******. That you are apparently so hyper- fixated on any perceived scrap of anti-Canelo sentiment that you would twist a mere casual and accurate assessment of a fight's reception made in passing in an otherwise unrelated article into some kind of embarrassing paranoid screed on pro-GGG bias pretty much says it all as to who the real "fangirl" is.

[Citizen Koba]

I stated that ggg-canelo 2 was a clear victory for canelo. Nothing debatable about the majority decision except by those "watch the may-pac fight in slow mo to see him win" nut jobs. Reading comprehension. Look it up.

It's debatable if people who appear to be otherwise reasonable are debating it... in fact any close decision in boxing is by definition a debatable result, being as how the scoring has a subjective element. Hell the 3 judges didn't even agree on the winner. If scoring boxing wasn't debatable then all three judges would always have the same score and 80% of boxing discussion would immediately cease to be. The fact that you are personally convinced that your opinion is correct doesn't instantly make all other opinions cease to exist y'know.

Any particular reason I should know about why your opinion is so much more valuable than that of those who disagree with you?

All you're actually saying is "my opinion is that anyone who disagrees with my opinion is wrong", which ain't really newsworthy since that kinda goes without saying.

[DreamFighter]

Golovkin lost his title on his 3rd good title defence, to a guy from the division below.

[Thuglife Nelo]

It's debatable if people who appear to be otherwise reasonable are debating it... in fact any close decision in boxing is by definition a debatable result, being as how the scoring has a subjective element. Hell the 3 judges didn't even agree on the winner. If scoring boxing wasn't debatable then all three judges would always have the same score and 80% of boxing discussion would immediately cease to be. The fact that you are personally convinced that your opinion is correct doesn't instantly make all other opinions cease to exist y'know.

Any particular reason I should know about why your opinion is so much more valuable than that of those who disagree with you?

All you're actually saying is "my opinion is that anyone who disagrees with my opinion is wrong", which ain't really newsworthy since that kinda goes without saying.

Are you guys saying that GGG’s defense in court are debating who won between Canelo vs GGG while the judge is sleeping on his back seat like Homer Simpson while the Herman Brothers have no clue what the defense is talking about and what it has to do with 3.5 million?