Tweet
People keep mentioning that Wladimir Kiltschko was 41 years of age, I am sure he was 40 years of age but still? It is irrelevant. He was vividly, VIVIDLY in better condition physically and technically in comparison to when he fought Tyson Fury. 'Even Wladimir Kiltschko himself stated he was in better condition, he had literally 3 training camps back to back' before he fought Anthony Joshua.
-
-
sanders was retired, brewster was a nobody. they are light years apart. rahman made mincemeat of prime sanders.
i dont get why you are lying about wlad not being prime for retired sanders.was when they faced Klitschko, the only difference is Rahman managed to knock Lewis out while he was in his prime.
Is it the fact that he lost horribly to a retiree who had never got near the title, too much to swallow?
i think you know tyson was hot favourite at that time for any contender who wasnt a champion. good luck convincing yourself otherwise.Douglas was hand picked by Don King, Don King said it himself. watch the 30 for 30, 42-1 and they break down the reason Tysons team chose Douglass and it definitely wasn't due to the rankings. The fact that you are also defending an opponent that was a 42-1 underdog as a "TOP" contender just shows me you have no idea what you are talking about.Comment
-
Rahman was dropped by Sanders...and prior to that he was made mincemeat by Oleg Maskaev. He was a nobody when he knocked out Lewis, why is that so hard for you to swallow?
Right, Wlad was in his prime against Sanders, and not after he hired Steward, completely revolutionized his whole fighting style and went on to become one of the most dominant and longest reigning heavyweights in the history of boxing. Maybe Wlad was in his prime when he fought Purity?i dont get why you are lying about wlad not being prime for retired sanders.
Is it the fact that he lost horribly to a retiree who had never got near the title, too much to swallow?
Yeah, but against any other contender he wasn't a 42-1 favorite.... Buster Douglas beating Tyson or Rahman beating Lewis were both 10 times more of an upset than Corrie Sanders beating Klitschko, but good luck convincing yourself otherwise.i think you know tyson was hot favourite at that time for any contender who wasnt a champion. good luck convincing yourself otherwise.Comment
-
which means that sanders was MORE of a nobody when retired for losing when prime to rahman.
yup. u destory your own argument.
now u r there.Right, Wlad was in his prime against Sanders
didnt even dominate in his own family, how on earth can he be the dominant champ. but he dominated bums like wach pianeta etc np sure. that any fool could dominate.and not after he hired Steward, completely revolutionized his whole fighting style and went on to become one of the most dominant and longest reigning heavyweights in the history of boxing.
dont get me wrong, wlad is a fairly good fighter within a narrow skillset. outside that, hes clueless.
very true but thats becos klitschko was rated as nothing compared to lewis.Yeah, but against any other contender he wasn't a 42-1 favorite.... Buster Douglas beating Tyson or Rahman beating Lewis were both 10 times more of an upset than Corrie Sanders beating Klitschko, but good luck convincing yourself otherwise.Comment
-
I'd be down for Wlad vs Wilder...Comment
-
I would like to see Wladimir Kiltschko face Tyson Fury & then retire. If Tyson Fury beats Deontay Wilder, I honestly don't think he will want to face Anthony Joshua straight away.Comment
-
Difference was that Lewis was in his prime, Wladimir wasn't.
Looks like sarcasm goes completely over your head.now u r there.
History books are going to remember Wladimir as a greater champion than Vitali.didnt even dominate in his own family, how on earth can he be the dominant champ. but he dominated bums like wach pianeta etc np sure. that any fool could dominate.
dont get me wrong, wlad is a fairly good fighter within a narrow skillset. outside that, hes clueless.
very true but thats becos klitschko was rated as nothing compared to lewis.Comment
-
you have things the wrong way. why do you keep doing this?
i gave your writing a fighting chance by ignoring the sarcasm else it would have been a terrible failLooks like sarcasm goes completely over your head.
you let it fall again.
neither dominated, thats all.History books are going to remember Wladimir as a greater champion than Vitali.Comment
Comment