Who picks the judges in boxing?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • daggum
    All time great
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Feb 2008
    • 43688
    • 4,652
    • 3
    • 166,270

    #1

    Who picks the judges in boxing?

    is it the a-side, the b-side or is it done randomly? just would like to know.
    4
    a-side
    100.00%
    4
    b-side
    0.00%
    0
    its totally random!
    0.00%
    0
  • Leben
    Contender
    Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
    • Jan 2019
    • 100
    • 1
    • 0
    • 2,594

    #2
    It's the commission right?

    Although a promoter/fighter's team can reject on good reason. AJ vs Parker is good to look at. People will criticise the ref and judges.

    The ref and judge selection was argued by Parker's team. They wanted a neutral ref and judges from both countries + 1 neutral. They had the choice of completely neutral everything.

    Parker's team afterwards cried about the ref but before said they researched the ref, signed off on him and described it as a massive win for the ref and judges.

    Comment

    • daggum
      All time great
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Feb 2008
      • 43688
      • 4,652
      • 3
      • 166,270

      #3
      Originally posted by Leben
      It's the commission right?

      Although a promoter/fighter's team can reject on good reason. AJ vs Parker is good to look at. People will criticise the ref and judges.

      The ref and judge selection was argued by Parker's team. They wanted a neutral ref and judges from both countries + 1 neutral. They had the choice of completely neutral everything.

      Parker's team afterwards cried about the ref but before said they researched the ref, signed off on him and described it as a massive win for the ref and judges.
      its sort of the commission...i dont want to influence other voters though so stay tuned for the answer!

      Comment

      • Luilun
        Undisputed Champion
        Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
        • Dec 2010
        • 12457
        • 555
        • 94
        • 58,436

        #4
        All I know Mayweather pick his own judges and ref just ask Castillo and Madaina how that work out ,hell he even picked Madaina gloves for him

        Comment

        • Robbie Barrett
          Banned
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Nov 2013
          • 40891
          • 2,779
          • 667
          • 570,921

          #5
          Originally posted by Luilun
          All I know Mayweather pick his own judges and ref just ask Castillo and Madaina how that work out ,hell he even picked Madaina gloves for him
          Pacquiao/Arum picked the judges in the JMM fights. 3 robberies in a row? Pure corruption.

          Comment

          • Luilun
            Undisputed Champion
            Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
            • Dec 2010
            • 12457
            • 555
            • 94
            • 58,436

            #6
            Originally posted by Robbie Barrett
            Pacquiao/Arum picked the judges in the JMM fights. 3 robberies in a row? Pure corruption.
            But fight 4 back fired no Judges needed

            Comment

            • Solntse
              Contender
              Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
              • Nov 2006
              • 293
              • 12
              • 3
              • 7,805

              #7
              Since Golden Boy has taken over, it is either Mr. Haymon or Mr. De La Hoya.

              Comment

              • daggum
                All time great
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Feb 2008
                • 43688
                • 4,652
                • 3
                • 166,270

                #8
                Originally posted by Robbie Barrett
                Pacquiao/Arum picked the judges in the JMM fights. 3 robberies in a row? Pure corruption.
                they did pick them so why are people surprised when dubious decisions happen? when its canelo-ggg or ward-kovalev there are people on here bragging about official wins. if you thought pac won then cool. if you thought marquez won then cool. the official judges are the worst barometer to say who won or not. even if you agree with the verdict, that doesnt mean the verdict was untainted.

                Comment

                • TonyGe
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                  • Dec 2016
                  • 11867
                  • 379
                  • 149
                  • 173,865

                  #9
                  Originally posted by daggum
                  they did pick them so why are people surprised when dubious decisions happen? when its canelo-ggg or ward-kovalev there are people on here bragging about official wins. if you thought pac won then cool. if you thought marquez won then cool. the official judges are the worst barometer to say who won or not. even if you agree with the verdict, that doesnt mean the verdict was untainted.
                  That's the reality of it for sure.
                  Last edited by TonyGe; 01-26-2019, 08:25 PM.

                  Comment

                  • JimmyValmer
                    Banned
                    • Aug 2018
                    • 977
                    • 60
                    • 15
                    • 70,352

                    #10
                    The commission. Richard Schaefer, Former Golden Boy CEO, explained this.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP