Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Joshua: I Thought Fury Beat Wilder, Fury is Huge Fight For Me

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #21
    I wonder if he'll agree to a fair split then ?

    Comment


    • #22
      Tyson Fury had 3 camps and 2 fights before fighting Wilder, and he was only 30 years old! Wlad was inactive nearly a year and a half, and was 41 years old! I think Wlad was at a bigger disadvantage vs. Joshua, than Fury was vs. Wilder! I think Fury edged out the victory, and he should be better next time! The question is can Wilder make any adjustments? No matter what happens, Fury is only 30, so he'll be around for at least 3-5 years! No excuse for Joshua vs. Fury NOT to happen!
      Last edited by Bronx2245; 01-26-2019, 08:30 AM.

      Comment


      • #23
        Translation from Eddie Hearnish to English= “now I have an excuse to avoid that bone jarring punching power that would knock me spark out since my head movement is as quick as seasonal change.”

        Comment


        • #24
          Originally posted by thack View Post
          I wonder if he'll agree to a fair split then ?
          I can answer that, NOPE!

          Comment


          • #25
            Originally posted by JimmyValmer View Post
            Wilder was outclassed by Fat Fury. he won decisively and anyone who thought Wilder won doesn't know shìt about boxing especially Alejandro Rochin
            Classic response when someone doesn't agree with you.

            Comment


            • #26
              Already has ...

              ... and a better split than Wilder gave Fury.

              Originally posted by thack View Post
              I wonder if he'll agree to a fair split then ?

              Comment


              • #27
                Course fury gona go with the easy fight in wilder make easy money get the belt he rightfully won in December then next Christmas in a undisputed British stadium fight with the two best fighters on the planet i think within two years all top five heavyweights will be British fury aj whyte Joyce dubios and hughie fury Gorman pushing the top ten aswell Britannia rules

                Comment


                • #28
                  Hard to give it to Fury when he was dropped twice, so were going to take the belt from the champ and give it to pillowfists, having said that.. Fury is the better boxer, more technical but Wilder hits harder.

                  I think Fury was outboxing him and winning a lot more rounds than Wilder but he got dropped twice! and he never dropped the champ, so I think the draw was fair for a change.

                  Comment


                  • #29
                    [QUOTE=Bossman15;19463716]Well you should of fought Fury when he called you out in for his first comeback fight or made a deal to secure that fight because you did steal not win those belts anyways plus you had the chance to fight Wilder as well[/QUOTEn]

                    Are you on drugs? You must surely be because only a dumbed down drug user would write such comment or a ******, which are you? My money is on both.

                    Comment


                    • #30
                      Why does no one ever question Fury and Wilder's boxing records??

                      If you take a useless Klitshcko off Fury's record who do you have?? as for Wilder. He beat Stiverne and Ortiz (who has beaten no one)

                      Looking at AJ's record after 20+ fights, you can see who the real fighter is here.... I am someone who remembers Fury ducking David Price. He even admitted it himself a few years back.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP