Wtf lol that’s dumb. He is more like a poor man’s David Haye. thurman is a low output, ambush fighter who runs for defense. He is so uninteresting to me, I couldnt care less if he retires. I never thought he was exciting.
Keith Thurman reminds me of Sugar Ray Leonard
Collapse
-
-
Spence would knock Thurman out and has been asking for a fight with Thurman for years but Thurman is fighting mediocre cherry pick Lopez. Thurman beat Garcia and Porter in close fights so he is a little better than they are but I think he loses to Spence and he almost certainly loses to the prime Leonard.Comment
-
Someone thinks Thurman can be compared to Sugar Ray. I confess I always hated Leonard because I thought he was arrogant and especially the time he embarrassed Haglar when he announced to everyone, with Haglar in the crowd, that he would never fight him. But I never questioned how good he was. He is truly one of the greats and for someone to say Thurman is better than Leonard is just fu**ing ******.Comment
-
Man you summed up his boxing style perfectly.Comment
-
Hey at least I have a rational arguement as to why. Judging by the responses to your post my reply was mild. Leonard hand speed superior. Leonard foot speed superior. Leonard's chin in his prime at Welterweight excellent. Leonard adaptability in the ring . Superior. Leonard's will to win outstanding. I don't see Keith who is a good fighter beating Leonard.Comment


Comment