Comments Thread For: Ellerbe: Mayweather's Retired; 'No Interest' In Pacquiao Rematch
Collapse
-
-
When Floyd was 38 a nd people asked Floyd to fight spence instead of berto they were accused of being Floyd haters and only wanting to see him lose, and that Floyd had paid his dues and should be allowed to fight berto or anyone.
Doesn't that apply to Pac then?Comment
-
-
Berto was a retirement fight. Is Pacquiao retiring? He shouldn't be holding titles if he doesn't want to fight the best.Comment
-
But Floyd has been accused of retiring to avoid toughest fights. Pac s fought much more than Floyd and if Pac chooses to fight broker type guys it's up to pac. Bro ners better then.many on floydds resume anyway.
Pac s 8 division titilist with 7o fights. He's got more right to take it easy than floyd.
Floyd was supposed to be the best so he had a duty to prove he was the best by fighting spence. Pac s not seen as the best so he isn't as obligated to fight spence like Floyd was. Why couldn't Floyd fight spence as retirement fight? Spence wasn't as highly rated as floyd. Why couldn't Floyd fight someone deemed not as good as him?Last edited by hugh grant; 01-20-2019, 05:32 PM.Comment
-
When he's holding a title he has no right to take it easy. He's holding something a more deserving fighter that is willing to take risks should have.But Floyd has been accused of retiring to avoid toughest fights. Pac s fought much more than Floyd and if Pac chooses to fight broker type guys it's up to pac. Bro ners better then.many on floydds resume anyway.
Pac s 8 division titilist with 7o fights. He's got more right to take it easy than floydComment
-
Floyd was supposed to be the best. Why didn't he have to fight spence to prove it? Why couldn't spence be retirement fight? Why not retire as the best?
I think Crawford or thurman should fight spence or each other before Pac doesLast edited by hugh grant; 01-20-2019, 05:37 PM.Comment
-
Comment
-
Comment