Do u consider Pac a legit world champion?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • IceTrayDaGang
    Banned.....
    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
    • Sep 2017
    • 15598
    • 2,182
    • 703
    • 194,686

    #11
    Originally posted by DaFan
    Hello no. All these organizations are illegitimate and corrupt, let alone that ****** "regular" thing.
    thurman is fighting a guy pac already beat and had no problem against........................................... ......

    Comment

    • Twako
      Undisputed Champion
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • May 2010
      • 2781
      • 295
      • 142
      • 15,069

      #12
      why not? who among the top WWs right now has a better resume? maybe thurman's at par. but definitely not spence, crawford or porter.

      Comment

      • pillowfists98
        The Takeover 2020
        Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
        • Jun 2018
        • 6685
        • 148
        • 81
        • 93,444

        #13
        No way. The WBA regular is a paper title.

        Comment

        • atom-ictortilla
          Up and Comer
          Interim Champion - 1-100 posts
          • Dec 2013
          • 90
          • 5
          • 2
          • 6,808

          #14
          Originally posted by .WesternChamp.
          thurman is fighting a guy pac already beat!!!!
          Huh? Double check your facts there...

          OP There is an argument for it. Thurman has been really inactive and basically was allowed to hold the belt hostage. And there is the fact that we are talking about pacman who obviously earned the title of champion. Because its Pac and because Thurman hasn't fought I'm cool with it. Lol

          Comment

          • kingstip9
            Undisputed Champion
            Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
            • Jun 2011
            • 2095
            • 488
            • 63
            • 32,854

            #15
            Originally posted by cally83
            No. Nothing against Pac, but there can only be one WBA champion, not Super, regular, interim. It dilutes the value of the belt. I hate that Canelo fought crappy fielding for that piece of crap belt too. Again, I love Canelo, but he was fooling nobody with that win and championship.
            Canelo/fielding was for a title? Lol what.
            I guess this further dilutes the argument of “oh but he fought more champions than anyone of recent times”

            Too many of them claim they are. That’s why it’s refreshing to see a fighter unify a division.. clearing up once and for all who’s best.

            Comment

            • D4thincarnation
              Undisputed Champion
              Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
              • Jan 2011
              • 16198
              • 533
              • 260
              • 133,240

              #16
              Originally posted by Boxfan83
              Do u consider his WBA Regular belt a legit world title? I say there's an argument that Pac is the true WBA champ because Thurman's been so inactive & is taking a "tune-up" for a comeback.

              Thoughts?

              Probably.

              If it was WBC, WBA or WBO Thurman would have been stripped and given some emeritus belt instead and Pacquiao would have won the vacant belt.

              Nobody is the man at the weight as yet.

              Comment

              • Curtis Harper
                Banned
                Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                • Dec 2018
                • 10113
                • 254
                • 446
                • 303,080

                #17
                Fringe as fu ck

                Comment

                • Boxfan83
                  The Coach
                  Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                  • Feb 2015
                  • 15837
                  • 2,100
                  • 731
                  • 160,371

                  #18
                  Originally posted by atom-ictortilla
                  Huh? Double check your facts there...

                  OP There is an argument for it. Thurman has been really inactive and basically was allowed to hold the belt hostage. And there is the fact that we are talking about pacman who obviously earned the title of champion. Because its Pac and because Thurman hasn't fought I'm cool with it. Lol
                  After Josesito beats Thurman, Pac vs Josesito...

                  Comment

                  • Earl-Hickey
                    Banned
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • Nov 2009
                    • 29031
                    • 2,832
                    • 1,384
                    • 297,750

                    #19
                    No but he's bigger than that anyway.

                    Comment

                    • RuleOfTheSpear
                      Undisputed Champion
                      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                      • Jun 2018
                      • 3555
                      • 493
                      • 311
                      • 53,043

                      #20
                      WBA is corrupt.

                      If it was WBO or WBC, Thurman would've been stripped for being inactive for 2 years!!!

                      Pacman is a better champ than Thurman will ever be!!

                      Keeping that belt hostage for two years is a disgrace!!!

                      HOW R U MORE INACTIVE THAN A PART TIME BOXER WHO WORKS IN THE SENATE??

                      Keep ducking Spence you one time champ.

                      At this rate, Pac will be facing Spence before you have the balls to even try

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP