Broner is good, defensively. Good not great. But with his skillset, speed and pure athletism he must be the most limited offensive fighter with those aforementioned attributes. It's damn frustrating to see him fight against equal or better competition.
I can't understand why people compared him to Mayweather. Rockin' the Philly-shell/shoulder roll doesn't make make you great. It takes more to it than that.
Broner knows how to move but he sure as **** doesn't know when to press the fight. I also know that a lot of that should be credited to Manny but Broner has done this before: watching his opponents miss without doing anything about it.
Mayweather would either get off first with a quick snapping jab to the head or body or bust you up with a counter straight right hand or even lead with it. Every single time his opponent makes a mistake, he gets punished. Broner just looks at you...and looks... And looks...and sometimes throws a punch or two. Also, he can't fight going backwards.
I can't understand why people compared him to Mayweather. Rockin' the Philly-shell/shoulder roll doesn't make make you great. It takes more to it than that.
Broner knows how to move but he sure as **** doesn't know when to press the fight. I also know that a lot of that should be credited to Manny but Broner has done this before: watching his opponents miss without doing anything about it.
Mayweather would either get off first with a quick snapping jab to the head or body or bust you up with a counter straight right hand or even lead with it. Every single time his opponent makes a mistake, he gets punished. Broner just looks at you...and looks... And looks...and sometimes throws a punch or two. Also, he can't fight going backwards.
Comment