Tweet
Oh cool man.
I just read some of your other posts and it's clear that you're a child and also not very intelligent, and you only back fighters and decisions based on race. I don't care at all about your opinion on boxing or anything really. You're just not smart enough.
There were 10 rounds in the Barrera fight where at the end of the round if you had a clear winner then you were looking for any way to give that guy a round.
So why did Kessler fight Ward in Oakland if Kessler was the number 1 seed? Do you think the fight being in Oakland, and Ward fighting all of his fights as the home fighter, contributed greatly to Ward not getting DQd in that fight?
I don't care at all about Ward tbh. It's just funny to see people back him so strongly just because he is the same race as them. Well he is only half black but still, his supporters only really support him because he is the great black hope against the white eastern euro fighters. As a boxer, Ward clearly benefited from home cooking and had he been from another country no one would know who he was. He just wasn't that good, the tape confirms that. You should watch it sometime.
For people who 1) know boxing, 2) and aren't biased, it is obvious that Ward was a complete hyped up fighter who, because he fought at home, was able to get away with breaking the rules and fighting dirty, and then at the end of fights would get generous scorecards, because again, he was at home. This is just anything an intelligent unbiased person sees when they watch the film and have any exposure to Andre's career. I wish him well and other than the fact that he is a halfway crook, I think he seems like a decent guy.
Unlike most Ward 'fans', I have watched a lot of Ward's fights. The only top non-controversial win he has is a 7-5 win over Froch. Every other win is either very controversial, or a very close fight against a B level fighter. If Ward was a better boxer I would have a better opinion of him, but anyone who watches the tape on him and sees a dominant boxer is just deluding themselves.
Clear 8-4 loss to Kov in first fight. First six was 5-1 Kov. Last six probably 3-2-1 for Kov. 8-3-1 probably the best score. Anyone giving Ward 5 rounds is not a serious person at all and their analysis should not be listened to. Between the second Kov fight and the Kessler fight easily Ward should have 1 DQ and probably 2.
To neglect to realize that Ward's 'success' is a product of his environment (fighting at home his whole career) is foolish and you should be better.
I just read some of your other posts and it's clear that you're a child and also not very intelligent, and you only back fighters and decisions based on race. I don't care at all about your opinion on boxing or anything really. You're just not smart enough.
There were 10 rounds in the Barrera fight where at the end of the round if you had a clear winner then you were looking for any way to give that guy a round.
So why did Kessler fight Ward in Oakland if Kessler was the number 1 seed? Do you think the fight being in Oakland, and Ward fighting all of his fights as the home fighter, contributed greatly to Ward not getting DQd in that fight?
I don't care at all about Ward tbh. It's just funny to see people back him so strongly just because he is the same race as them. Well he is only half black but still, his supporters only really support him because he is the great black hope against the white eastern euro fighters. As a boxer, Ward clearly benefited from home cooking and had he been from another country no one would know who he was. He just wasn't that good, the tape confirms that. You should watch it sometime.
For people who 1) know boxing, 2) and aren't biased, it is obvious that Ward was a complete hyped up fighter who, because he fought at home, was able to get away with breaking the rules and fighting dirty, and then at the end of fights would get generous scorecards, because again, he was at home. This is just anything an intelligent unbiased person sees when they watch the film and have any exposure to Andre's career. I wish him well and other than the fact that he is a halfway crook, I think he seems like a decent guy.
Unlike most Ward 'fans', I have watched a lot of Ward's fights. The only top non-controversial win he has is a 7-5 win over Froch. Every other win is either very controversial, or a very close fight against a B level fighter. If Ward was a better boxer I would have a better opinion of him, but anyone who watches the tape on him and sees a dominant boxer is just deluding themselves.
Clear 8-4 loss to Kov in first fight. First six was 5-1 Kov. Last six probably 3-2-1 for Kov. 8-3-1 probably the best score. Anyone giving Ward 5 rounds is not a serious person at all and their analysis should not be listened to. Between the second Kov fight and the Kessler fight easily Ward should have 1 DQ and probably 2.
To neglect to realize that Ward's 'success' is a product of his environment (fighting at home his whole career) is foolish and you should be better.
Comment