Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: McGregor Lashes Out at Malignaggi, Who Fires Back

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #41
    These two act like high school girls...enough already.

    Comment


    • #42
      I say let McGegor fuuckk *****boy up that ****ttt would be hilarious cuz a phaggg like malignaggi deserves to get embarrassed.

      Comment


      • #43
        Kick his cull Paulie, but I doubt you can.

        Comment


        • #44
          Originally posted by Noelanthony View Post
          Let’s agree to disagree then . Conor outboxing a fighter that plodded forward and threw 4 punches in a round is not because he was a masterful boxer and he was bamboozled because he was a lefty or the other points you gave . Every man and his dog knew Conor would gas especially throwing punches repeatedly and he did. I wouldn’t rule out Paulie giving Floyd a complete diagnosis of Conor’s strengths and weaknesses so even the 1st round Floyd was totally at ease, contrary to what you claim
          If Conor was so outmatched, why didn't Floyd just KO him in the first round? Why did he have any success against Floyd?

          Comment


          • #45
            Originally posted by Boxing1012 View Post
            If Conor was so outmatched, why didn't Floyd just KO him in the first round? Why did he have any success against Floyd?
            Depends what you define as success?Who has Floyd Knocked out in the first round when he has been the most dominant ? In the last 10 years we can agree he has dominated most of his opponents but not knocked them out.Having said that I don’t believe I then need to answer your question or do I??

            Comment


            • #46
              Originally posted by Noelanthony View Post
              Depends what you define as success?Who has Floyd Knocked out in the first round when he has been the most dominant ? In the last 10 years we can agree he has dominated most of his opponents but not knocked them out.Having said that I don’t believe I then need to answer your question or do I??
              But now you're comparing Conor's success to the success other pro boxers have had against Floyd. Conor was an MMA guy. That he had similar success, and I would say better success, compared to other recent guys Floyd has faced was impressive.

              Comment


              • #47
                Originally posted by Boxing1012 View Post
                But now you're comparing Conor's success to the success other pro boxers have had against Floyd. Conor was an MMA guy. That he had similar success, and I would say better success, compared to other recent guys Floyd has faced was impressive.
                Mayweather wasn't even trying in the first damn half of the fight. He just walked forward and threw nothing. You thinking it was legit is a ****ing joke.

                Comment


                • #48
                  Originally posted by Boxing1012 View Post
                  But now you're comparing Conor's success to the success other pro boxers have had against Floyd. Conor was an MMA guy. That he had similar success, and I would say better success, compared to other recent guys Floyd has faced was impressive.
                  No I’m not because I didn’t think Conor was successful at all. I think if we got your definition of what you deem as successful perhaps I may be inclined to see your point. Surely the punches Conor threw had 0 effect as Mayweather was walking him down and not even concerned about countering when Floyd blocked most of Conor’s shots on his glove

                  Look at Ali vs George Foreman to the untrained eye Foreman was giving Ali a battering. Ali knew the game plan. Should Foreman take credit that the rounds prior he was outworking him and beating him to a pulp? Critics would suggest he had no choice as George was just to strong he was forced into that tactic.

                  Conor as much as I do admire the showman in him offers nothing as a boxer. The fact Paulie Malignaggi fancies his chances having been in the ring with Conor tells you everything you need to know about Conor as a boxer

                  Comment


                  • #49
                    Originally posted by Noelanthony View Post
                    No I’m not because I didn’t think Conor was successful at all. I think if we got your definition of what you deem as successful perhaps I may be inclined to see your point. Surely the punches Conor threw had 0 effect as Mayweather was walking him down and not even concerned about countering when Floyd blocked most of Conor’s shots on his glove

                    Look at Ali vs George Foreman to the untrained eye Foreman was giving Ali a battering. Ali knew the game plan. Should Foreman take credit that the rounds prior he was outworking him and beating him to a pulp? Critics would suggest he had no choice as George was just to strong he was forced into that tactic.

                    Conor as much as I do admire the showman in him offers nothing as a boxer. The fact Paulie Malignaggi fancies his chances having been in the ring with Conor tells you everything you need to know about Conor as a boxer
                    Man I think you must be having a rough day and are looking for an argument or something. Floyd walked him down in the later rounds but in the early rounds Conor had a lot of success and in doing so won the early rounds. Just the way it was.

                    Comment


                    • #50
                      Originally posted by BeLikeWater View Post
                      Ok... That was lame. It's like they both forgot how to talk smack.
                      Yeah, yeah that was bad.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP