Posters that are fanatics.

[Dean_Razorback]

He's insecure about white fighters and Puerto Ricans too. He thinks Daniel Zaragoza is better than Willie Pep, Harry Greb, Benny Leonard, Barney Ross, Mickey Walker etc; etc;

He says Wilfredo Gomez had the WBO fixing fights for him yet they didn't even exist until years after his career LOL. He says Carlos Ortiz got a gift over Vailant but then when called out on it he couldn't verify and knew nothing about the fight. He claimed Palamino was robbed vs. Benitez because it was a split yet the one judges admitted his card was wrong because he had sun in his eyes lol.

He tries to pass of as some kind of historian yet he's done no research and just goes to boxrec as he goes along. Hasn't done any collecting or searching for films and reports and just twists everything to suit his tired, bigoted narrative. Claims to be a history expert yet had never heard of Eder Jofre and thinks Luis Rodriguez fought Carlos Monzon.

dude follows me around like a stalker. i though he just hated argentine fighters. now i know he is a complete ignorant

[chrisJS]

dude follows me around like a stalker. i though he just hated argentine fighters. now i know he is a complete ignorant

He stalks me around too. Always with a bunch of race **** all the time and has the nerve to say I follow him LOL. I don't think I've ever initiated any contact with that loser yet he keeps going. He's a few screws lose for sure.

[pillowfists98]

j.razor is the worst. A total fanboy for any Black American/PBC fighter. And he always feels the need to respond to everybody clogging this forum with his ****** posts.

['b']

Robbie B is cool, gets so many panties in a bunch on here.

[Mexican_Puppet]

He's insecure about white fighters and Puerto Ricans too. He thinks Daniel Zaragoza is better than Willie Pep, Harry Greb, Benny Leonard, Barney Ross, Mickey Walker etc; etc;

He says Wilfredo Gomez had the WBO fixing fights for him yet they didn't even exist until years after his career LOL. He says Carlos Ortiz got a gift over Vailant but then when called out on it he couldn't verify and knew nothing about the fight. He claimed Palamino was robbed vs. Benitez because it was a split yet the one judges admitted his card was wrong because he had sun in his eyes lol.

He tries to pass of as some kind of historian yet he's done no research and just goes to boxrec as he goes along. Hasn't done any collecting or searching for films and reports and just twists everything to suit his tired, bigoted narrative. Claims to be a history expert yet had never heard of Eder Jofre and thinks Luis Rodriguez fought Carlos Monzon.

My dear fan boy lol

Im white, my grandfather was italian, you are crazy...

Of fact, you are a ******ed that said that Sanchez was not in the top-5 of mexican history.

You said that Canelo is not a elite fighter.

That LaPorte won the fight against Chavez.

Lol

[Mexican_Puppet]

Dean is a fu.cking nationalist.

He does not likes boxing, he likes to hype mediocre fighters of this country.


Look talking about this sh.it:

i think fabian can accomplish as much as his brother. though it sucks his opponent is a fossil

A guy that knows about this:

This guy is a normal prospect.

Klimov was a 130 pounds fighter.

And Parra is another natural 130 pounds fighter

He likes to do this kind of sh.it.

He always says that fighters from Argentine are perfect fighters, very good fighters, they always have chances of get a win against fighters that are a lot better than them.

This is my problem with my son Dean.,

And i dont have anything about argentine like nation, i have friends from there and I like his culture

[Mexican_Puppet]

He stalks me around too. Always with a bunch of race **** all the time and has the nerve to say I follow him LOL. I don't think I've ever initiated any contact with that loser yet he keeps going. He's a few screws lose for sure.

Im in this thread because that ******ed guy quote me and was talking about me with lies.

And when I stalked you?

You are a crazy man that needs mental attention

You are talking about me in this thread, first...

For me, you are a boxing nerd, does not know sh.it about this.

Thinks that Mikey Garcia is a normal boxer.

That Ede Jofre was better than Alexis Arguello o Salvador Sanchez

[Dean_Razorback]

Man.

You said all that sh.it.

And you know it

An example:




A guy that knows about this:

https://www.boxingscene.com/forums/showthread.php?t=803453

And you always do this kind of sh.it.


You said that Rueda would K.O Valdez

That Cuellar would K.O brutally Mares

That MAtthysse would be the winner against Pacquiao by KO

You are a fuc.king nationalist

no, never said such things. and i still believe fabian can accomplish a lot. he is a really good fighter.

idk why you keep bringing rueda. i said he has power (which he does) but has a crystal chin. look for those posts or enter my user profile, i had a conversation with a user about it.

[chrisJS]

My dear fan boy lol

Im white, my grandfather was italian, you are crazy...

Of fact, you are a ******ed that said that Sanchez was not in the top-5 of mexican history.

You said that Canelo is not a elite fighter.

That LaPorte won the fight against Chavez.

Lol

Here you are completely lying yet again. I have Sanchez rated #4 and have always said that you piece of ****. I said Canelo is elite I just said he's not great or as good as Hagler or Monzon. I also said I had Chavez beating LaPorte you scumbag.

I never said Mikey Garcia is "normal". I've said he's elite and one of the best today.

Yes, of course I rank Jofre higher than Sanchez and Arguello. These are opinions shared by historians such as Springs Toledo, Bert Sugar, The Ring, Matt McGrain etc; etc; all people that have forgotten more about boxing this month than you've learned your entire pathetic life. You didn't even know who Jofre was until a month ago and know nothing of his fights and era. Stop acting like you are an authority. You don't know ****, kid and it's truly pathetic you think your biased nationalistic view is better than real historians who have done real researched and know all these fighters and have no such prejudices.

http://www.boxing.com/the_100_greatest_fighters_of_all_time_part_ten_10_1.html

http://boxrec.com/media/index.php/Th...rs_of_All_Time

http://boxrec.com/media/index.php/Th..._Last_80_Years

All three have Jofre ahead of Arguello and Sanchez yet your punkass thinks that's "crazy" lol. You don't know **** and you keep proving it.

[Mexican_Puppet]

Here you are completely lying yet again. I have Sanchez rated #4 and have always said that you piece of ****. I said Canelo is elite I just said he's not great or as good as Hagler or Monzon. I also said I had Chavez beating LaPorte you scumbag.

I never said Mikey Garcia is "normal". I've said he's elite and one of the best today.

Yes, of course I rank Jofre higher than Sanchez and Arguello. These are opinions shared by historians such as Springs Toledo, Bert Sugar, The Ring, Matt McGrain etc; etc; all people that have forgotten more about boxing this month than you've learned your entire pathetic life. You didn't even know who Jofre was until a month ago and know nothing of his fights and era. Stop acting like you are an authority. You don't know ****, kid and it's truly pathetic you think your biased nationalistic view is better than real historians who have done real researched and know all these fighters and have no such prejudices.

http://www.boxing.com/the_100_greatest_fighters_of_all_time_part_ten_10_1.html

http://boxrec.com/media/index.php/Th...rs_of_All_Time

http://boxrec.com/media/index.php/Th..._Last_80_Years

All three have Jofre ahead of Arguello and Sanchez yet your punkass thinks that's "crazy" lol. You don't know **** and you keep proving it.

Too long, did not read, really man, you always do bibles for me and im not reading your ****

You are a rat for me, i dont read your bibles.