Comments Thread For: Adrien Broner: I Don't Give A F*** About Mayweather & Pacquiao

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Sinbad
    Contender
    Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
    • Oct 2018
    • 132
    • 0
    • 0
    • 9,817

    #11
    You're absolutely right mr. mexican style.
    I've always disliked Broner and after listening to his comments lately, i dislike him even more.
    I actually think that this fight is gonna be a mismatch, but i hope Pac-man punishes this kid.
    But no matter what the outcome, in his own opinion he's never lost a fight in his life.

    Comment

    • Sinbad
      Contender
      Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
      • Oct 2018
      • 132
      • 0
      • 0
      • 9,817

      #12
      This kid Broner is one of the most arrogant, irritating wannabe-gangsters i've ever seen in my life.
      And worst of all, always in denial. I've never actually thought about his iq, but your estimation might be a little high.
      With this about dimes-man, like Frank Sinatra sang: Send in the clowns.

      Comment

      • jinx_htx
        Contender
        Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
        • Jun 2012
        • 217
        • 12
        • 0
        • 9,326

        #13
        I wonder if AB's gonna cuss out Leonard Ellerbe again. Maybe Freddie Roach and Broner will get into a verbal exchange at some point. Say what you want about AB, the dude's entertaining as hell. Lmao!!!

        Comment

        • Nusky
          Undisputed Champion
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Feb 2017
          • 1376
          • 286
          • 20
          • 25,129

          #14
          Originally posted by The tucker
          Are You saying that you wouldn’t get upset either if they are asking you about your opponent and who he would fight next as if they know your going to get beat?
          What I'm saying is I'd be smart enough to know they were trying to bait me with a question that's already been asked multiple times. And instead of giving them what they want I'd say "next question" on some drew rosenhaus s---.

          All they have to do is mention mayweather vs pac2 and broner drops F bombs and gets pissed off. His act Is tired and so is the media's.

          Comment

          • pedrito
            Contender
            Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
            • Apr 2007
            • 308
            • 22
            • 1
            • 8,955

            #15
            I'm trying to figure out what AB's last meaningful win over top competition was... and I think you need to go all the way back to 2013 to his razon thin decision over Malignaggi.

            An old and shot Pac is still miles above Broner.

            Comment

            • The tucker
              Undisputed Champion
              Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
              • Aug 2014
              • 2009
              • 435
              • 297
              • 33,113

              #16
              Originally posted by Nusky
              What I'm saying is I'd be smart enough to know they were trying to bait me with a question that's already been asked multiple times. And instead of giving them what they want I'd say "next question" on some drew rosenhaus s---.

              All they have to do is mention mayweather vs pac2 and broner drops F bombs and gets pissed off. His act Is tired and so is the media's.
              the funny thing is he literally said that or the other time he just ignored it and started talking to another reporter. But when you get asked that 20 more times anyway your going to get agitated.

              Comment

              • strykr619
                Undisputed Champion
                Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                • Sep 2010
                • 3120
                • 201
                • 104
                • 56,729

                #17
                Originally posted by pedrito
                I'm trying to figure out what AB's last meaningful win over top competition was... and I think you need to go all the way back to 2013 to his razon thin decision over Malignaggi.

                An old and shot Pac is still miles above Broner.
                Pac is old, but i don't consider him shot by far.

                Comment

                • P4Pdunny
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                  • Jul 2017
                  • 8094
                  • 143
                  • 142
                  • 58,715

                  #18
                  I'm not putting my faith in Broner, been there done that

                  Comment

                  • EasternEuroFan
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                    • Nov 2018
                    • 1284
                    • 58
                    • 0
                    • 32,601

                    #19
                    Originally posted by strykr619
                    Pac is old, but i don't consider him shot by far.
                    Maybe not shot by most peoples standards, but from what he was to what he is now, it wouldn't be unfair to say he's shot.

                    People are putting too much stock in the fact he beat a shot Matthysse who was never even that good in his prime.

                    Pac is 2 years older now than he was when he lost to Horn. Regardless of whether you think he won or lost that fight, you have to ask yourself if Pacquiao at anywhere near his best would have had any trouble with Horn? the answer would be no, not at all. That to me says a lot, especially since he's even older now and nobody gets better at 40.

                    Comment

                    • strykr619
                      Undisputed Champion
                      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                      • Sep 2010
                      • 3120
                      • 201
                      • 104
                      • 56,729

                      #20
                      Originally posted by EasternEuroFan
                      Maybe not shot by most peoples standards, but from what he was to what he is now, it wouldn't be unfair to say he's shot.

                      People are putting too much stock in the fact he beat a shot Matthysse who was never even that good in his prime.

                      Pac is 2 years older now than he was when he lost to Horn. Regardless of whether you think he won or lost that fight, you have to ask yourself if Pacquiao at anywhere near his best would have had any trouble with Horn? the answer would be no, not at all. That to me says a lot, especially since he's even older now and nobody gets better at 40.
                      I agree with this assessment. He is still a top 5 WW thou even at 40 which is crazy.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP