Is Pacquiao the end of the line for El Terrible? (My column)

[psychopath]

The End of the line for "El Terrible"?

Well if he loses in a bizzare fashion it's gonna be more like it. Bizzare, I mean if he get TKFO again or if he gets dominated completely.

We will have to wait and see. Eric cannot be counted out, I'm expecting the guy to go out there with everything he has and try to outwit Pac. Don't expect much of a rumble or an all out slugfest like it happen before. Eric's best chance to win is to box and run and that's what he's gonna do.

[Memorex]

I can't wait till Erik shuts up all the Pacquiao fans. Erik is coming refreshed and ready for the fight of his life. The question is, Paquiao are you ready for Erik "El Terrible" Morales? If Manny takes Erik lightly, just because he tko'd him in the second fight, then he's making a huge mistake.

[AREALFIGHTER]

Is Pacquiao the end of the line for El Terrible?
By Ryan ********, photo courtesy USA Today
6-8-2006



It is general knowledge that fighter's can get old overnight, and for Erik Morales, that night was January 20, 2006. On that night, Filipino flash Manny Pacquiao annhilated and demolished the great Morales, dropping him twice en route to a tenth round stoppage. As the fallen warrior lay prone on the canvas, many in the sport had come to the conclusion that the sand had simply run out of "El Terrible's" hour glass. However, after contemplating his options, Morales elected to fight Pacquiao once again. While Morales has a history of disproving detractors, many question the wisdom of this move. Did Morales just run into a roadblock against a great fighter, or has he finally hit the wall?

Erik Morales, 48-4 (34 KO) is no stranger to being written off as a dominant fighter. More than once in his career, Morales had been labeled as a shot fighter, a guy who had bitten off more than he can cumulatively chew. Each time he had been discredited by the boxing public, he came back to prove himself once again as a living legend to be remembered by boxing fans.

The first time the boxing press suggested he might be slipping was in 2000. In one of the greatest fights of the last 20 years, Morales won a close and controversial decision over Barrera. Following the hell of their initial encounter, Morales seemed vulnerable, winning shaky decisions over B level opposition.

Feeling the need to prove himself to the world, Morales faced Barrera again in 2002. Despite not getting the decision in a fight he might have gotten the better of, he showed that he was still a great fighter. Morales rebounded from his first professional loss well, by moving up to the junior lightweight division to decision Jesus Chavez and Carlos Hernandez for title belts.

Having won titles in three divisions, Morales decided to finish his trilogy with his arch rival Marco Antonio Barrera. From the outset, Morales appeared flat and without desire as he was outhustled and outslugged by Barrera. Having suffered the second loss of his career in such clear fashion, he once again had to deal with the press that questioned how much he had left in the tank. What better way to answer that than to face the most dangerous fighter in the sport, Manny Pacquiao?

In their first bout, Morales and Pacquiao declared war in one of the most sensational bouts of 2005. While Pacquiao had his moments, Morales' experience, aided by a horrid gash in the middle of Pacquiao's face, was enough to secure a decision victory. Once again on top of the boxing world, Morales' career had been rejuvenated with what was one of the most courageous exhibitions of his career.

Following the brilliance of their first fight, they decided to do it again the next year. Before they were to meet again, they both appeared on the same card in tuneup bouts to hype up public support of their rematch. While Pacquiao knocked out his opponent, Morales' assignment did not go according to plan. Unable to get his rhythm going, he was thoroughly humiliated and schooled by the unheralded Zahir Raheem.

During the course of the bout, Morales exhibited many symptons of being all done in as a fighter. One sure fire sign of a fighter being shot is his balance. When a shot fighter throws a punch, often times his feet will become crossed and he will fall off balance. Raheem capitalized on Morales' balance all night, dominating the Tijuana native with counter punching and movement. While many attributed Morales' sluggish performance to an over ambitious jump in weight, it became an omen of things to come.

In spite of his Morales' unsuccessful effort in his last fight, the rematch between the instant rivals took place anyways. of After controlling most of the first half of the fight, Pacquiao’s youth and power began to take apart the Mexican legend. After inflicting the first two legitimate knockdowns of Morales’ career, Pacquiao’s youth and will overcame Morales and finished him in the tenth round. Following his first knockout loss, many ringside observers felt that Morales’ tank had finally run empty.

In a surprising move, Morales decided to excercise a rematch clause for a third fight when most pundits figure this to be a foolish move. Having lost three of his last four fights, it is a very questionable move on Morales behalf. Going straight from a knockout loss straight back to the man who finished you is an extremely bold move, but is it wise?

Fighters are often too brave for their own good, and in that instance the man's support system needs to step in and assess the situation. To Morales' detriment, he parted business interests with his father Jose, the only trainer he had ever had during his career. In addition to his unstable support system are his ongoing struggles at the scale. During the planning for the third fight with Pacquiao, Morales tried unsuccessfully to negotiate a catch weight of 132. In between bouts, Morales has been known to balloon to as high as 170 pounds. Now contrast that with Pacquiao, who is a notorious gym freak who maintains his conditioning very well. Morales' inability to control his weight between fights as well as the rumor that he smokes cigarettes are also going to be against his favor.

Since the last time they fought, Pacquiao defeated Oscar Larios in convincing fashion, keeping sharp while awaiting his third encounter with Morales. They will meet again on November 18, by which time Morales would have been inactive for ten months. For the first time in his career, Morales will be a justifiable underdog in an uphill battle. Can Morales turn back the hands of time, or is Manny Pacquiao the end of the line for one of the greatest fighters of the last ten years?

Ryan ******** is a syndicated columnist. Any comments or questions, you can reach him at mc_rson@yahoo.com .

I have enjoyed your articles you have your bias as any writer but the rose colored glasses have not been put on keep it that way. Good luck hope you get paid some for the good work. Nice insite but the other side of the story is out there to maybe you can monopolize.

[AREALFIGHTER]

LOL, exactly my point. He's been finished since the Pacquiao fight, and since then he hasn't fought another good young fighter. When he fought another young fighter in juarez, Juarez almost took his head off. When Barrera stops picking and choosing his opponents, hes going down. Im picking Juarez to KO Barrera and end his reign as an elite fighter once and for all.

Just one question has Pac ever gotten up from being knocked down?

[Mr. Ryan]

Just one question has Pac ever gotten up from being knocked down?

Yes he has. He was dropped by Nedal Hussein and some Eastern European journeyman, both times getting up. Thanks alot for the advice. Its hard to remain unbiased, but I feel I do a good job there. Im actually planning a Pacquiao article about who can beat him, realistically. I have to write alot of Pacquiao stuff cuz I write for his website. I'm gonna do another article soon about Ali and one about Holyfield soon also.

[BLOODSHED]

Asian Sensation,

Good article. I, personally, think it's too early to tell if Morales isn't what he used to be.

But, I definitely think the lop sided defeat to Raheem meant nothing in the long run. Because his main rivals at the weight (Pacquiao and Barrera) aren't boxers like Raheem is.

So he isn't going to see any of that style that gave him problems against Pacquiao and Barrera.

So, why did he lose to Pacquiao? Who knows. Maybe Pacquiao had a better strategy (or it was the gloves)... Maybe Morales is losing it. I think this fight can redeem Morales and we'll see if he "still has it."

Basically, the Raheem defeat meant nothing. Raheem has that style to give Morales trouble. Luckily for Morales, no one else really at that weight fights like Raheem.

[kg21mvp]

Yes he has. He was dropped by Nedal Hussein and some Eastern European journeyman, both times getting up. Thanks alot for the advice. Its hard to remain unbiased, but I feel I do a good job there. Im actually planning a Pacquiao article about who can beat him, realistically. I have to write alot of Pacquiao stuff cuz I write for his website. I'm gonna do another article soon about Ali and one about Holyfield soon also.

haha.. its really tough to not be biased e****ially if youre writing a pac article!LOL

[kg21mvp]

I can't wait till Erik shuts up all the Pacquiao fans. Erik is coming refreshed and ready for the fight of his life. The question is, Paquiao are you ready for Erik "El Terrible" Morales? If Manny takes Erik lightly, just because he tko'd him in the second fight, then he's making a huge mistake.

he will be ready make a note on that!

pac IMO experienced morales' skills in the 1st fight and learned his lesson on the 2nd fight and the most unforgiving thing that EM did was to be in a brawl with pac! i gonna pitch the question back to you is EM gonna be perfect come fight night? is he gonna make the weight? or will pac agree to set a catch weight of 132 that sill costs eM's camp a lot of money for those extra pound but he surely needs it..

[ferocity]

Is Pacquiao the end of the line for El Terrible?
By Ryan ********, photo courtesy USA Today
6-8-2006



It is general knowledge that fighter's can get old overnight, and for Erik Morales, that night was January 20, 2006. On that night, Filipino flash Manny Pacquiao annhilated and demolished the great Morales, dropping him twice en route to a tenth round stoppage. As the fallen warrior lay prone on the canvas, many in the sport had come to the conclusion that the sand had simply run out of "El Terrible's" hour glass. However, after contemplating his options, Morales elected to fight Pacquiao once again. While Morales has a history of disproving detractors, many question the wisdom of this move. Did Morales just run into a roadblock against a great fighter, or has he finally hit the wall?

Erik Morales, 48-4 (34 KO) is no stranger to being written off as a dominant fighter. More than once in his career, Morales had been labeled as a shot fighter, a guy who had bitten off more than he can cumulatively chew. Each time he had been discredited by the boxing public, he came back to prove himself once again as a living legend to be remembered by boxing fans.

The first time the boxing press suggested he might be slipping was in 2000. In one of the greatest fights of the last 20 years, Morales won a close and controversial decision over Barrera. Following the hell of their initial encounter, Morales seemed vulnerable, winning shaky decisions over B level opposition.

Feeling the need to prove himself to the world, Morales faced Barrera again in 2002. Despite not getting the decision in a fight he might have gotten the better of, he showed that he was still a great fighter. Morales rebounded from his first professional loss well, by moving up to the junior lightweight division to decision Jesus Chavez and Carlos Hernandez for title belts.

Having won titles in three divisions, Morales decided to finish his trilogy with his arch rival Marco Antonio Barrera. From the outset, Morales appeared flat and without desire as he was outhustled and outslugged by Barrera. Having suffered the second loss of his career in such clear fashion, he once again had to deal with the press that questioned how much he had left in the tank. What better way to answer that than to face the most dangerous fighter in the sport, Manny Pacquiao?

In their first bout, Morales and Pacquiao declared war in one of the most sensational bouts of 2005. While Pacquiao had his moments, Morales' experience, aided by a horrid gash in the middle of Pacquiao's face, was enough to secure a decision victory. Once again on top of the boxing world, Morales' career had been rejuvenated with what was one of the most courageous exhibitions of his career.

Following the brilliance of their first fight, they decided to do it again the next year. Before they were to meet again, they both appeared on the same card in tuneup bouts to hype up public support of their rematch. While Pacquiao knocked out his opponent, Morales' assignment did not go according to plan. Unable to get his rhythm going, he was thoroughly humiliated and schooled by the unheralded Zahir Raheem.

During the course of the bout, Morales exhibited many symptons of being all done in as a fighter. One sure fire sign of a fighter being shot is his balance. When a shot fighter throws a punch, often times his feet will become crossed and he will fall off balance. Raheem capitalized on Morales' balance all night, dominating the Tijuana native with counter punching and movement. While many attributed Morales' sluggish performance to an over ambitious jump in weight, it became an omen of things to come.

In spite of his Morales' unsuccessful effort in his last fight, the rematch between the instant rivals took place anyways. of After controlling most of the first half of the fight, Pacquiao’s youth and power began to take apart the Mexican legend. After inflicting the first two legitimate knockdowns of Morales’ career, Pacquiao’s youth and will overcame Morales and finished him in the tenth round. Following his first knockout loss, many ringside observers felt that Morales’ tank had finally run empty.

In a surprising move, Morales decided to excercise a rematch clause for a third fight when most pundits figure this to be a foolish move. Having lost three of his last four fights, it is a very questionable move on Morales behalf. Going straight from a knockout loss straight back to the man who finished you is an extremely bold move, but is it wise?

Fighters are often too brave for their own good, and in that instance the man's support system needs to step in and assess the situation. To Morales' detriment, he parted business interests with his father Jose, the only trainer he had ever had during his career. In addition to his unstable support system are his ongoing struggles at the scale. During the planning for the third fight with Pacquiao, Morales tried unsuccessfully to negotiate a catch weight of 132. In between bouts, Morales has been known to balloon to as high as 170 pounds. Now contrast that with Pacquiao, who is a notorious gym freak who maintains his conditioning very well. Morales' inability to control his weight between fights as well as the rumor that he smokes cigarettes are also going to be against his favor.

Since the last time they fought, Pacquiao defeated Oscar Larios in convincing fashion, keeping sharp while awaiting his third encounter with Morales. They will meet again on November 18, by which time Morales would have been inactive for ten months. For the first time in his career, Morales will be a justifiable underdog in an uphill battle. Can Morales turn back the hands of time, or is Manny Pacquiao the end of the line for one of the greatest fighters of the last ten years?

Ryan ******** is a syndicated columnist. Any comments or questions, you can reach him at mc_rson@yahoo.com .

Im going to be honest with you.....you article sucks balls, well actually it sucks pacquiaos balls. Seriously man, you are all up on Pacquiaos balls. In the first paragraphy you act like Pacquiao totally destroyed Morales from round 1 to the last bell which it wasn't like that. Then you say, the Morales first fight with Pacquiao was the best performance ever from Morales which is just horse****. Then you say Morales was thourally dominated by Barrara in their third fight which is also horse****. Seriously man you should not do any aritcles on Pacquiao cause you are too biased towards Pacquiao. You really put the fork in Morales and all his accomplishments. Rahmeem didn't kill Morales or give him a thorough beating neither did Pacquiao gave him a beating though out the fight.

I ain't ever heard people say Morales smoke cigarettes this is the first i've heard of this.

Then you give no credit what so ever to Oscar Larios who gave your boy trouble and almost had him in la, la land. This article sucks balls and thats just being honest. Never write about Morales again or Barrera or Larios and burn this article.

[ferocity]

he will be ready make a note on that!

pac IMO experienced morales' skills in the 1st fight and learned his lesson on the 2nd fight and the most unforgiving thing that EM did was to be in a brawl with pac! i gonna pitch the question back to you is EM gonna be perfect come fight night? is he gonna make the weight? or will pac agree to set a catch weight of 132 that sill costs eM's camp a lot of money for those extra pound but he surely needs it..

When Morales v. pacquiao fight is signed i will bet you all my points or anybody all my points on Morales, this ****ty article from asian sensation, pissed me off. Erik Morales will ko Pacqiao this time around, belive it!