Spences resume is weak as hell...

[Larry the boss]

So what.... theres still question marks surrounding brook and brook has looked terrible every fight since the golovkin one. Its not a win that makes spence some p4p level fighter in isolation. It was a bad prediction thats all....

Brook has looked bad since Golovkin??? cause before him he looked great against???

[Madison Boxing]

Brook has looked bad since Golovkin??? cause before him he looked great against???

He beat shawn porter who was heavily hyped at the time when he was undefeated. Its a good win for spence agaisnt brook but it has question marks against it, spence still has a lot to prove. He struggled in a lot of that fight too until brook ran out of gas which could be due to dropping down 2 weight classes.

[Lopez_Boxing]

He looks nice, basic resume, still unproven on exactly good he is till he fights top guys. He asked for porter and Thurman they are going a different route. Garcia isn't interrested. No his resume isn't specail, but it isn't finished. If people like him and hype him what's the big deal? Their opinion matters and is just as valid as yours.

[Larry the boss]

He beat shawn porter who was heavily hyped at the time when he was undefeated. Its a good win for spence agaisnt brook but it has question marks against it, spence still has a lot to prove. He struggled in a lot of that fight too until brook ran out of gas which could be due to dropping down 2 weight classes.

you hyped the hell out of brook before the fight..stop making excuses.its sad

https://www.boxingscene.com/forums/showthread.php?t=744814

[Madison Boxing]

you hyped the hell out of brook before the fight..stop making excuses.its sad

https://www.boxingscene.com/forums/s...d.php?t=744814

Its a bad prediction thats all but it doesnt change what ive put. Hes still pretty unproven cause we dont know how good brook was at that point.

[daggum]

Do I make threads saying how they are going to destroy Manny then discredit the win?

i don't know. its the same basic argument you made though. lots of people get caught up in the hype. some guy on here even thought broner would be the fighter of the decade. hype and reality are different though. in reality beating a guy coming off a ko loss isnt usually the best win no matter what someone said beforehand

[sicko]

It is not a fighter active today who Resume can't be nitpicked and broken down and exposed as "WEAK" NOT ONE! Other than maybe Canelo. Thurman and Danny Garcia have strong Resumes as well.

Thurman is #1 at Welterweight> Spence Jr and Crawford for me until someone beat him...if they can even beat him. Healthy Thurman can fight and he is a COMPLETE FIGHTER! I think if healthy he can no doubt beats BOTH!

[.!WAR MIKEY!.]

once mikey beat spence, they'll treat him like tim bradley lol. as if he's not even black anymore lol.

exactly, you know how they are. He would have to beat up a few women and eat some strippers ass in a strip club to earn their "REAL" CARD back lmfao.

[Raggamuffin]

Gets talked about like some proven elite p4p fighter, everyone hes beat got whooped before they fought him. His best wins- algieri (dropped 8 times against pacquiao), peterson (stopped early by mattysse) brook (stopped in 5 by golovkin). And now hes fighting a lightweight. The guy is barely any more proven than the charlos. Or is he another 'eye test' champion who doesn't have to fight anyone. And whys he so scared of crawford for? Does he ever plan on calling him out?

Ive been screaming this for a long time.

[Raggamuffin]

once mikey beat spence, they'll treat him like tim bradley lol. as if he's not even black anymore lol.

Only a insecure ***** brings up **** like this you deformed degenerate lmao.