Can some one please explain what "exposed" mean?

[icha]

The hype that fans are giving them? Hardly seems fair to bash a fighter for not living up to their some unreasonable expectations.

i dont think is charlo fans the one calling it exposed, they are the ones that gave him the hype... to me he just isnt as good as we tought, doesnt mean he is a bad fighter...
it was really hard to judge him before this fight due to the lack of opposition... not saying korobov is a top fighter at mw either, but him and washed up trout is the best he has faced..

[j.razor]

Sure not problem. I'll use it in a sentence.

Charlo was exposed as a hype job after being declared by the LDBC (Lions Den Boxing Cubs) as the middleweight boogie man, which Canelo and GGG were ducking.

There.

If you use it in a sentence it has to make sense cuz Jermall was NOT "exposed" & Triple L's own team said they want no parts of the middleweight boogie man.

There.

[filup79]

A fighter has an off night and people say they were exposed. People be calling Jacobs an elite MW, but I remember people calling him a bum and glass chinned. That he was exposed by Mora when Mora knocked him down. They were calling Jacobs overhyped when he couldn't finish and had dull fights against Arias and Sulecki. You could say Canelo was exposed by Floyd and Lara when they fought and couldn't cut off the ring. Top fighters will always end up in a tougher than expected fight in their career that wasn't expected. Look at Dogboe recently, he struggled and lost to a nobody from Mexico, someone he was supposed to beat.

[Lion81]

If you use it in a sentence it has to make sense cuz Jermall was NOT "exposed" & Triple L's own team said they want no parts of the middleweight boogie man.

There.

Let me use it in another context OP, see it helps.

Charlo EXPOSED himself to J.Razor and J.Razor went to town.

[j.razor]

It means when a fighter's perceived skill is shown to be better than their actual skill.

Prime example (other than Charlo) was when Ryan Garcia was hyping up a fight with Tank, and then struggled to get the decision against Morales.

Those were very poor examples. Let me help you out.

After fighting 36 low leveled opponents golovkin was exposed when he stepped up to fight good competition 3 times (Jacobs & Nelo twice) & failed to live up to the hype, hence Triple L.

[j.razor]

Except Ryan is 20 years old, still learning. Charlo on the other hand is 28. Prime boxing age.

Charlo EXPOSED. See how that works out TS?

Jermall Charlo won his fight & was not exposed. See how that works out?

[j.razor]

He looked really bad.

It's one thing to only have power, but win some rounds without the 2 knockouts.

For me, he was exposed and looked terrible against Fury.

So what YOU are trying to say is that YOU use it when it fits your narrative. Got it.

[hhs661]

Jeff Lacy vs Calzaghe = Exposed
David Price vs Tony Thompson = Exposed
Michael Grant vs Lennox Lewis = Exposed

[j.razor]

When a guy hyped up to beat golovkin and canelo, gets countered all night and arguably lost to a C level fighter who took the fight on 2 weeks notice and had only fought an opponent who was 16-12 in space of 2 years. Thats what being exposed is

LOL....Stop lying to yourself, you know Mall beat that dude & had him hurt & running like he has Triple L RUNNING....LMMFAO!

Now that's exposed....LMMFAO!

[j.razor]

Much as I like to needle Charlo fans, I do not think Korobov "exposed" Jermall. Korobov is still one of the highest skilled fighters today. I'm still not certain if Charlo is great or just very good but coming up short in the skill dept. against Korobov is no great shame.
If Jermall had had the same fight against Monroe then maybe a case could be made. Korobov's performance was inspired, if he had trained for 12 with that same enthusiasm he might well have had a clear victory.

He was training, he was going to fight on the undercard & got bumped up to fight Jermall since Willie got hit with the PEDS's..