The difference between GGG and Charlo is astonishing
Collapse
-
Yes, he was fighting at 168. He was fighting at super middleweight which is the 168 pound division thus making the statement factually correct.
You are why this site needs a noobie policy. You start watching boxing two or three years ago and think you are above everyone when in reality you are just a fanboy that would never qualify for the site if it was filtered for real fans with intelligent discussion.Comment
-
How was he fighting at 168 when the contracted weight was 162?Yes, he was fighting at 168. He was fighting at super middleweight which is the 168 pound division thus making the statement factually correct.
You are why this site needs a noobie policy. You start watching boxing two or three years ago and think you are above everyone when in reality you are just a fanboy that would never qualify for the site if it was filtered for real fans with intelligent discussion.
Are you really that slow?Comment
-
GGG on total is slightly ahead with his draw with an elite.
However at the same point in career aged 28, Charlo is light years ahead on a world title streak but GGG stuck on euro level with a 2nd tier belt.Last edited by DreamFighter; 12-27-2018, 02:27 PM.Comment
-
Comment
-
If you love charlo that's fine. But don't make a thread like this embarassing yourself all happy when he struggled and lost to a 35 year old journeyman. The definition of a FAN BOY. He'll never ever criticize his favorite fighter even when he's been exposed and looked like ****.Comment
-
Dummy, that chris guy said he was fighting at 168. 162 is not 168 even though they are both SMW weights.
Thats like me saying floyd and canelo fought at 154 which is FALSE because they fought at 152.
You guys need to be smarter than this.
Last edited by mcdonalds; 12-27-2018, 03:59 PM.Comment
-
See your wrong again, they weighed in at 162. By the time they entered the ring they were well above that nuffy, a turd has a higher IQ than youComment
-
-
Comment
Comment