Does Dillian Whyte deserve another shot and Joshua

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Laligalaliga
    Undisputed Champion
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • Mar 2018
    • 6439
    • 71
    • 11
    • 90,109

    #111
    Originally posted by Boxing Goat
    Lol @ thinking I'm stressed. I don't care about any of their fights unless AJ fights Fury or Wilder. Those are the only 3 that really matter. Stop kidding yourself.
    It's fine then.
    Wait patiently until either fight is made. Am sure non of those fights is happening this year. Maybe early or late 2020. Before then, lemme enjoy my boxing.

    Cheers.

    Comment

    • Laligalaliga
      Undisputed Champion
      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
      • Mar 2018
      • 6439
      • 71
      • 11
      • 90,109

      #112
      Originally posted by Boxing Goat
      I see, so you're trolling me now? Is this Dillian Whyte? Can I get a graph my man?
      No one is trolling you bro. Am just telling you exactly the way it's is. Miller has no notable name or any top 10 in his resume. So what's the buzz about him? For the fact that it's not the fight we have seen doesn't make it worthy.

      Kownaski can as well make a case for himself to for a title shot because he's never faced AJ before going by your logic. At least Kownaski has spilka and Martin the former IBF champ on his resume.

      Comment

      • Laligalaliga
        Undisputed Champion
        Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
        • Mar 2018
        • 6439
        • 71
        • 11
        • 90,109

        #113
        Originally posted by Boxing Goat
        Go wash your mouth out with soap. I was probably following boxing before you were born.

        I give AJ credit for facing Klitschko but really does he deserve as much seeing as how he was fighting a guy that Fury already beat and had been off for 2 years? You should think about that. Those in glass houses shouldn't cast stones. And newbie trolls shouldn't talk sh@t.
        Either you like it or not, for fury not been able to defend the titles, I still strongly believe it was a one night fluke. One fight, 4 belts, no defence and nothing more until proven other wise.

        Am not part of the people cajoled by one night performance.

        Comment

        • Boxing Goat
          The G.O.A.T.
          Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
          • Aug 2013
          • 13150
          • 557
          • 1,027
          • 128,865

          #114
          Originally posted by Laligalaliga
          Either you like it or not, for fury not been able to defend the titles, I still strongly believe it was a one night fluke. One fight, 4 belts, no defence and nothing more until proven other wise.

          Am not part of the people cajoled by one night performance.
          Of course you would think that as it supports your opinion lol

          The Fury vs. Wilder fight should prove to you that it was no fluke. (even though Klitschko was old)

          Comment

          • Laligalaliga
            Undisputed Champion
            Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
            • Mar 2018
            • 6439
            • 71
            • 11
            • 90,109

            #115
            Originally posted by Boxing Goat
            Lol @ the novice comment. He was a fricken gold medalist! But yeah, it was a great win but I can't forget that Klitschko was 41 and most heavies are past it at 35.
            Lolx..... How funny.
            But somehow Wilder's win against a 40yr Ortiz is such a great achievement and his best win and some even tagged him a killer.

            It's so funny in here how some will want to compare Ortiz that has no achievement to a serial champion.

            I can't help but laugh.

            Comment

            • Laligalaliga
              Undisputed Champion
              Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
              • Mar 2018
              • 6439
              • 71
              • 11
              • 90,109

              #116
              Originally posted by Boxing Goat
              Of course you would think that as it supports your opinion lol

              The Fury vs. Wilder fight should prove to you that it was no fluke. (even though Klitschko was old)
              He was a mere challenger and it was a two sided opinion.

              He won and lost at the same time with such performance.

              Some ref would have ended the fight after that 12 KD long even before he got up. But it is what it is, hez just a challenger for now. It's a different pressure defending multiple belts and fighting as a challenger.

              Comment

              • Boxing Goat
                The G.O.A.T.
                Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                • Aug 2013
                • 13150
                • 557
                • 1,027
                • 128,865

                #117
                Originally posted by Laligalaliga
                Lolx..... How funny.
                But somehow Wilder's win against a 40yr Ortiz is such a great achievement and his best win and some even tagged him a killer
                .

                It's so funny in here how some will want to compare Ortiz that has no achievement to a serial champion.

                I can't help but laugh.
                So you're speaking to me but referring to others opinions now, yet I'm supposed to speak to you as if you're legit and not just a brit fanboy? Why should I value your opinion?

                Comment

                • Boxing Goat
                  The G.O.A.T.
                  Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                  • Aug 2013
                  • 13150
                  • 557
                  • 1,027
                  • 128,865

                  #118
                  Originally posted by Laligalaliga
                  He was a mere challenger and it was a two sided opinion.

                  He won and lost at the same time with such performance.

                  Some ref would have ended the fight after that 12 KD long even before he got up. But it is what it is, hez just a challenger for now. It's a different pressure defending multiple belts and fighting as a challenger.
                  He got up before the ten count and finished the fight while most thought he got a decision. All that on the back of a very lengthy layoff. I feel pretty certain that Fury has more then proven his value. If you disagree, that's fine but I would say that the census opinion is definitely on my side.

                  Comment

                  • Dean_Razorback
                    God of Thunder and R n' R
                    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                    • Jan 2013
                    • 16559
                    • 1,028
                    • 396
                    • 98,048

                    #119
                    no one wants that rematch right now.

                    Comment

                    • Laligalaliga
                      Undisputed Champion
                      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                      • Mar 2018
                      • 6439
                      • 71
                      • 11
                      • 90,109

                      #120
                      Originally posted by Boxing Goat
                      So you're speaking to me but referring to others opinions now, yet I'm supposed to speak to you as if you're legit and not just a brit fanboy? Why should I value your opinion?
                      yeah, because you are beginning to sound like a wilder fan girl.
                      You want to credit wilders win to discredit wlad win.

                      And everybody knows that
                      wlad >>>> Ortiz.
                      Nobody argues that, not even a ******.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP