Youll miss golovkin when hes gone....

[Bjl12]

His official loss to Canelo alone ranks better because most people thought he won and the fight was close and could've gone either way.

Wilder got outclassed and made look like an amateur. Nobody but a few nuthuggers thinks he drew let alone won the Fury fight.

Most people do not think Gennady won the 2nd fight. They thought it was a draw and Canelo won. Most people thought Gennady won the 1st fight and it was a draw. If your account of "most people" is different you're either lying to yourself or extremely biased.

Either way...for every achievement Canelo has in his career from here on out...it only bolsters Gennady's criminally weak resume. After 24 rounds between the two it remains somewhat unclear who the better fighter is although Gennady looked much worse for wear in their 2nd fight...Canelo fully acclimated to 160 plus Gennadys age...bad combination

[Madison Boxing]

Didn’t you create a thread about him just the other day?

[Jedi Vader]

How about you address the rest of my post instead of wilfully picking on one, irrelevant part of it as usual?

You made a ****** statement, got called out on it and now all you can do is impress some butthurt imbeciles like the guy above me. That's the petty Jedi Vader I know and love.

If that part of your post was irrelevant, why post it?. ******

Wilder's draw with Fury is better than any GGG win. GGG has beaten nobody of any note. You then pick out a GGG defeat and say that he won the fight. Again, ******.

This is what Boxing Scene is about when it comes to nuthuggers because a defeat is actually a win. Then, posters like you try to defend their ****** comments. Why can't you just admit that GGG drew and lost against Canelo? He LOST, do you understand that?

I can't stand Wilder and I had Fury up but that doesn't mean that I'm going to rewrite history and tell everyone that he won because he didn't.

Only nuthuggers, who can't admit defeat, do that.

[Szef]

If that part of your post was irrelevant, why post it?. ******

Wilder's draw with Fury is better than any GGG win. GGG has beaten nobody of any note. You then pick out a GGG defeat and say that he won the fight. Again, ******.

This is what Boxing Scene is about when it comes to nuthuggers because a defeat is actually a win. Then, posters like you try to defend their ****** comments. Why can't you just admit that GGG drew and lost against Canelo? He LOST, do you understand that?

I can't stand Wilder and I had Fury up but that doesn't mean that I'm going to rewrite history and tell everyone that he won because he didn't.

Only nuthuggers, who can't admit defeat, do that.

I said he won the fight in the eyes of most fans but admited that it was close and it could've gone either way. Stop putting your words in my mouth.

A draw in a fight where you get outclassed and embarrassed isn't the same as an L in a very close fight that could've gone either way. Golovkin's stock didn't drop as dramatically as Wilder's despite losing the fight, what does that tell you?

Besides, Golovkin also had a draw with Canelo in a fight where again, most people thought he won. Nobody thinks Wilder won vs Fury. Or how about the Jacobs win is that W a worse result as well? There's a context to every fight and you know it, but you hate GGG too much to admit it.

Lol, what a ****** thing to say.

[KingHippo]

--- Whoops Popkins record and more popular too.

Did it without squalin' like Popkins was prone to.

Need a hundred more Canelo's and Golovkins and a hundred less Popkins.

Historians will look back at his record and ask why his best win was against Jacobs. And that defense record comes with an asterisk by the way.

History doesn't care about feelings, only facts.

And I'm not even going to address that part about Golovkin being more popular then Hopkins. That should be grounds for banning.

[Jedi Vader]

I said he won the fight in the eyes of most fans but admited that it was close and it could've gone either way. Stop putting your words in my mouth.

A draw in a fight where you get outclassed and embarrassed isn't the same as an L in a very close fight that could've gone either way. Golovkin's stock didn't drop as dramatically as Wilder's despite losing the fight, what does that tell you?

Besides, Golovkin also had a draw with Canelo in a fight where again, most people thought he won. Nobody thinks Wilder won vs Fury. Or how about the Jacobs win is that W a worse result as well? There's a context to every fight and you know it, but you hate GGG too much to admit it.

Lol, what a ****** thing to say.

In the eyes of most fans means you too or else you wouldn't have used that excuse to back up your reasoning.

I don't think Wilder deserved the draw but the fact is he got a draw whether we like it or not and that draw is better than GGG's defeat to Canelo.

GGG drew and lost whether you like it or not. Just as the bogey man lost twice to Ward, wether you like it or not. You'd rather rewrite history than admit that your boys drew and got beat.

Pathetic.

[Szef]

In the eyes of most fans means you too or else you wouldn't have used that excuse to back up your reasoning.

I don't think Wilder deserved the draw but the fact is he got a draw whether we like it or not and that draw is better than GGG's defeat to Canelo.

GGG drew and lost whether you like it or not. Just as the bogey man lost twice to Ward, wether you like it or not. You'd rather rewrite history than admit that your boys drew and got beat.

Pathetic.

Meh whatever. You just don't get it. Other people do doe.

https://www.boxingscene.com/forums/showthread.php?t=802450

[Jedi Vader]

Meh whatever. You just don't get it. Other people do doe.

https://www.boxingscene.com/forums/s...d.php?t=802450

If you and other people want to rewrite history to make yourselves feel better, that's up to you.

The fact is simple, Wilder drew and GGG lost that second fight and there is nowt you can do to change those facts.

Deal with it.