Why won't Joshua mention Fury's name?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • boliodogs
    Undisputed Champion
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • May 2008
    • 33358
    • 824
    • 1,782
    • 309,589

    #31
    I don't think Fury would dominate AJ. AJ is a good boxer who has mastered all the punches in boxing. He throws all the punches correctly with speed and power. He has a variety of punches with both hands that he can hurt and finish Fury with. AJ is a good finisher KOing everybody but Parker. Fury showed in his fights with Wlad and Wilder that against a big punching top heavyweight he is more of a tapper than a big puncher.

    Comment

    • N/A
      Undisputed Champion
      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
      • Jul 2017
      • 9269
      • 214
      • 0
      • 12

      #32
      Originally posted by DaNeutral.
      They didnt
      AP, ESPN, Yahoo, LA Times, Sporting News, Washington Post, etc all had a draw or Wilder winning. When that many top level publications don't have Fury winning, you can't cry robbery when the official decision is a draw.

      Comment

      • Robbie Barrett
        Banned
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Nov 2013
        • 40891
        • 2,779
        • 667
        • 570,921

        #33
        Originally posted by WBC WBA IBF
        block away. the facts ate the facts whether you bury your head in the sand or not.

        40% draw, 40% fury, 20% wilder means a draw isn't a robbery.

        i dont care what the thread is about. i replied to the lie you wrote in this thread.
        You've been asked to provide a source for this repeatedly and have failed to provide one. It's BS lies.

        Comment

        • N/A
          Undisputed Champion
          Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
          • Jul 2017
          • 9269
          • 214
          • 0
          • 12

          #34
          Originally posted by Robbie Barrett
          You've been asked to provide a source for this repeatedly and have failed to provide one. It's BS lies.
          I've provided sources over and over, including BoxingScene's own poll of experts.

          You're just a coward who likes to spew nonsense and then block people to stop them from pointing out your lies.

          Comment

          • Robbie Barrett
            Banned
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Nov 2013
            • 40891
            • 2,779
            • 667
            • 570,921

            #35
            Originally posted by WBC WBA IBF
            I've provided sources over and over, including BoxingScene's own poll of experts.

            You're just a coward who likes to spew nonsense and then block people to stop them from pointing out your lies.
            No you haven't provided a source for the ringside media you keep claiming scored 40%, 40%, 20% at all. You're a ****ing liar.

            Comment

            • removed
              Undisputed Champion
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Nov 2008
              • 21479
              • 4,005
              • 831
              • 164,542

              #36
              Originally posted by boliodogs
              I don't think Fury would dominate AJ. AJ is a good boxer who has mastered all the punches in boxing. He throws all the punches correctly with speed and power. He has a variety of punches with both hands that he can hurt and finish Fury with. AJ is a good finisher KOing everybody but Parker. Fury showed in his fights with Wlad and Wilder that against a big punching top heavyweight he is more of a tapper than a big puncher.
              Joshua has only faced a couple of boxers with decent movement and he looked rubbish against both of then. He'll KO slow plodders like Povetkin & Brezeale all day, but when he comes up against someone who can move and box effectively on the back foot, he'll get exposed.

              Comment

              Working...
              TOP