Is it good for the sport when PBC fighters lose?

[sicko]

Not about PBC it is one the fighters, how many damn PBC threads are people going to make just because Jermell and Jermall was in tough fights

It is all about the fighters and what they want, if they wanted to fight 4 times a year that could be arranged especially now with 2 Networks to work with but fighters also have to understand that not every fight is going to be a big Purse fight if you're going to want to stay active. We're not the ones getting punches in the face for a living so if guys can make a great living only fighting 2-3 times a year they have that F#cking right. Sorry but no fighter wants to retire Punch Drunk, Slurring and Mumbling

[OCPancho]

Boxing fans need to learn losing is part of the game.
UFC fans deal with it and move on.
Boxing fans and nuthuggers talk so much smack and aren't as forgiving.

[The3]

How can that be good? Sports need more 50/50 or 60/40 fights (Not salaries , in-ring action)

[rickJen]

Charlo wants to go back in the ring ASAP doe.
Within 4 months, not 6-9 months, which has always been the case
with these young prime lions doe.

[rolshans]

It's good when inactive fighters lose, PBC or not.

[Tony Trick-Pony]

Anything to put these guys in the ring more often...

[rickJen]

Anything to put these guys in the ring more often...

Yeah, seeing them lose gives fans more chances of seeing them often.