At least in the UK. You have someone like Eddie Hearn telling you what is a good fight, and what makes a good card. "Yea, this card is stacked, it's on PPV and you should buy it!" And a lot of people just say "great!" and do just that. If you look closer, these cards are mediocre. I know there's a new wave of boxing fans and I'm probably more old fashioned in my views, but surely this approach isn't going to stick long term? Anyone I know, who's been a boxing fan longer than 5 years, is totally disillusioned with the current state of affairs and have either lost interest entirely or will watch the fights for free/at a later date when they can skip all the trash fights.
Has this approach always been the case? Maybe I'm just becoming more cynical as I get older. Whyte-Chisora II being PPV would be like Harrison-Sprott II being PPV. If you look on the undercard there are no interesting fights. There's a domestic Featherweight fight which may be competitive, and a paper title fight between two midgets. Other than that, all house fighters vs. paid losers. Can't believe this chit is going out on PPV. Really hope it bombs, but doubt it will make any difference to Hearn trying to rip everyone off regardless.
Has this approach always been the case? Maybe I'm just becoming more cynical as I get older. Whyte-Chisora II being PPV would be like Harrison-Sprott II being PPV. If you look on the undercard there are no interesting fights. There's a domestic Featherweight fight which may be competitive, and a paper title fight between two midgets. Other than that, all house fighters vs. paid losers. Can't believe this chit is going out on PPV. Really hope it bombs, but doubt it will make any difference to Hearn trying to rip everyone off regardless.
Comment