Thats too easy, because none of them actually suck. I mainly created this thread to show that you can say any boxer sucks and make it sound convincing if you just look at their weaknesses.
I just think that it is funny that on boxing forums, where we are all diehard boxing fans, meaning we like boxing, we spend a lot more time trashing and critisizing fighters then we do complementing them.
yeah i know i agree with the point you are trying to make but that's just ythe way ppl are half of them prob never even seen the fighters they talk about anyways
Hey, I could have faked it and just looked up his losses on boxrec and used those. At least I'm being honest about it and not trying to say things about somebody who I've never seen fight.
4cornermessiah, I can tell by your name that you suck, so I don't care what you say.
He only had one loss and from what i heard it was a controversial one. Salvador Sanchez was no doubt one of the greatest Mexican fighters!
Salvador Sanchez, to be honest I've never actually seen him fight. But I can tell by his name that he ******.
Oh oh.....got you on this one huh? He's the greatest Mexican fighter and you don't know him? I can't really say anything bad about him.......actually I don't want to...he a great great fighter.
Paquiao was exposed in the Marquez fight. He is a one dimensional fighter who only knows how to come straight forward and has horrible defence. Anybody who knows how to box will beat Paquiao, just use lateral movement and he is bewildered. His win over a Morales who practically starved himself to death to make weight isn't that impressive, especially considering what happened in their first fight, when even a straight forward brawler like Morales was able to completely outbox him.
Salvador Sanchez, to be honest I've never actually seen him fight. But I can tell by his name that he ******.
thank you for the pacman commentary, I would normally get riled up with those comments but your ending paragraph with SAL just nullifies whatever you said on the first ... lol
Thats too easy, because none of them actually suck. I mainly created this thread to show that you can say any boxer sucks and make it sound convincing if you just look at their weaknesses.
I just think that it is funny that on boxing forums, where we are all diehard boxing fans, meaning we like boxing, we spend a lot more time trashing and critisizing fighters then we do complementing them.
he he, bro could you improve on the pacquiao sucks comment, its a little outdated, pac gets better every fight ...
Whether you suck or not is all relative. Someone is the best until someone else beats him. Everything is relative. When you say something like "this boxer has a weak punch", so what? He's got a weak punch compared with some martial arts guy but he has the hardest punch in the boxing business. So then does he suck or not? When someone says a boxer sucks, he's obviously thinking there's someone else better than that boxer.
Comment