I agree. AJ is slowly becoming irrelevant among boxing fans. He really needs to step his game up. It's either now or never for him. He really needs to stop these bum of the month fights and start taking on some serious risks. Tyson Fury has. We already know that he is huge in the U.K. However, in just a few months from now, if he doesn't start expanding outside of Britain and start fighting stiffer opponents, then both Fury and Wilder would have surpassed him globally, if they haven't already done so
Name me one bum he’s fought recently. Do you mean the replacement opponent takam? The champion Parker or the ex champion and mandatory contender povetkin?
Lolx..... Until he start selling out stadiums before I can take you serious.
You need some fccking beer.[/Q
Yeah man, I fail to see how a guy who was on his back twice in his last fight is all of the sudden "the man" hahaha. These guys hate AJ so much that they make up stuff to make it worse. No matter who AJ fights next, it will sell out Wembley and do a million PPV buys. And he doesn't have to sit there and mention Wilder and Fury every single day the way that Wilder and Fury mention him. If Wilder would ever grow a pair and sign the contract and fight AJ, this whole thing can be resolved
The more they try to talk AJ down the more stadium fights will not be enough for his fans and the more jealous they will become.
When a fight ends in a draw, and 40% of ringside experts have it a draw, how is that a robbery?
Yes, more people thought Fury won than thought Wilder won, but if 60% of ringside experts don't think Fury won, where is the robbery?
Ringside experts? People that are all from the same country as Wilder, are 10+ metres away and can only view the fight from one angle?
The vast majority of experts, fighters, fans had Fury winning. You just want to select a group of people that best suits your defence of Wilder and even they had Fury winning.
Ringside experts? People that are all from the same country as Wilder, are 10+ metres away and can only view the fight from one angle?
That is how boxing is judged. From up close, from one angle.
None of the official judges were from the US, so country of origin is irrelevant. I don't see you complaining about the fact that 99% of the people on this site crying "robbery" are from the same country as Fury.
The vast majority of experts, fighters, fans had Fury winning. You just want to select a group of people that best suits your defence of Wilder and even they had Fury winning.
I didn't select the group, BoxingScene interviewed numerous top experts and the majority of them didn't have Fury winning. Many did, but so many had it a draw, and enough had Wilder winning, that Fury winning was the minority opinion.
The majority of experts didn't have Fury winning, sorry. Draw was a very very common score at ringside.
That is how boxing is judged. From up close, from one angle.
None of the official judges were from the US, so country of origin is irrelevant. I don't see you complaining about the fact that 99% of the people on this site crying "robbery" are from the same country as Fury.
I didn't select the group, BoxingScene interviewed numerous top experts and the majority of them didn't have Fury winning. Many did, but so many had it a draw, and enough had Wilder winning, that Fury winning was the minority opinion.
The majority of experts didn't have Fury winning, sorry. Draw was a very very common score at ringside.
Minority had Fury winning? That's absolute bollocks.
BTW post where you got the ringside experts scores from you keep claiming. I've seen no source of this.
Comment