Comments Thread For: Canelo Destroys Rocky Fielding in Three For WBA Title
Collapse
-
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
This was a B U L L S H I T fight..That bum "Rocky" did everything possible to loose.I have no idea why would anyone make a big deal of this victory.This was worse than Cotto's victory over "one legged" Martinez & a dehydrated Geale..If Canelo wants to be considered among the best getting "gift" decisions & fighting dead beats is gonna get him there..Canelo & Oscar should stop ducking Jacobs & Charlo & now probably Callum & get it on..Comment
-
Primes can be long, and primes can be short lived.
Some examples of fighters who had long primes are Floyd, Pacquiao, Hopkins, Marquez.
Some examples of fighters who had short primes are Erik Morales, Fernando Vargas, Juan Diaz.
Some examples of fighters with average primes were Oscar De La Hoya, Julio Cesar Chavez sr, Winky Wright.
I say GGG seems to be competing at a high level in his mid 30s, like the example of fighters with long primes.Last edited by Snowballer; 12-16-2018, 01:25 PM.Comment
-
Lol. You mad.This was a B U L L S H I T fight..That bum "Rocky" did everything possible to loose.I have no idea why would anyone make a big deal of this victory.This was worse than Cotto's victory over "one legged" Martinez & a dehydrated Geale..If Canelo wants to be considered among the best getting "gift" decisions & fighting dead beats is gonna get him there..Canelo & Oscar should stop ducking Jacobs & Charlo & now probably Callum & get it on..
This is a tune up fight buddy.
Don't get your panties in a knot.Comment
-
[QUOTE=BigStomps;19360181]You didn't go to the Canelo fight cause you couldn't afford it??
You broke welfare hoe! ��
Hey Big Stomps I should have never fed in to your nonsense. Broke welfare hoe? Sounds like something a 16 year old would say. A little advice. Enjoy boxing and avoid the name calling ******ity!Last edited by Alan Smithee; 12-19-2018, 12:30 AM.Comment
-
that's not long primes. They were able to maintain themselves and not have a drastic fall off but mayweather not pac were the same fighters in their mid to late 30s that they were when they were in their 20s. Neither was Marquez. Hopkins is an odd case because he started boxing very late so while his physical prime was behind him, his technical skills increased with age. In the case of ggg, he started showing a noticeable decline based on his performances at around 34. Again, doesn't mean he wasn't still elite, but not the same guy from a couple of yrs earlier.Primes can be long, and primes can be short lived.
Some examples of fighters who had long primes are Floyd, Pacquiao, Hopkins, Marquez.
Some examples of fighters who had short primes are Erik Morales, Fernando Vargas, Juan Diaz.
Some examples of fighters with average primes were Oscar De La Hoya, Julio Cesar Chavez sr, Winky Wright.
I say GGG seems to be competing at a high level in his mid 30s, like the example of fighters with long primes.Comment
-
[QUOTE=Snowballer;19360984]Lol. You mad.
This is a tune up fight buddy.
Don't get your panties in a knot.[/QUOTE
Hey Snowballer, we get the tuneup issue and the fact that it was for a 'title" but this fight had a stench to it as soon as it was made. Staying busy is cool, especially with the DAZN deal but May should be a reputable opponent. If he drops to 160 he should at least fight a ring magazine top 10. I'm doubting that it will be Jacobs, Andrade, Charlo, or Saunders. Most like Sulecki, Lemieux, or even Derevyanchenko. Would mind any of those guys as long as he doesn't milk the DAZN deal with second tier guys forever. Can't hate him for taking some easier fights. He already has a world class resume.Comment
-
Fighters evolve, even in their primes. Its a natural occurrence. They get smarter and wiser with time.that's not long primes. They were able to maintain themselves and not have a drastic fall off but mayweather not pac were the same fighters in their mid to late 30s that they were when they were in their 20s. Neither was Marquez. Hopkins is an odd case because he started boxing very late so while his physical prime was behind him, his technical skills increased with age. In the case of ggg, he started showing a noticeable decline based on his performances at around 34. Again, doesn't mean he wasn't still elite, but not the same guy from a couple of yrs earlier.
Hopkins became a pro at 23 and had some tough fights along the way.
GGG became a pro at 24, and was fed nothing but cans.
When GGG finally stepped up, he's aura of invincibility and his "unnatural power" and but vanished.
But if it makes you feel better to have the opinion that Canelo beat a shell of what GGG once was or could have been then by all means have it.Comment
Comment