ESPN commentary

[RetroSpeed05]

Just saw the fight back on espn's broadcast what are people complaining about exactly? The way people said people say they are bias how give me a moment?

Bradly in fact gave Pederaza a lot of credit in some rounds where Pedraza didn't do anything, for every landed pitty pat shot Pedrza landed Loma rocked his head back. Punching to keep Loma at bay deserves the commentary to mention that?

The only round i was surprised is round 10. Loma looked his worst here. he should have done more of that all fight not just throw shots to keep Loma at bay while landing nothing effective.

[Derranged]

When people say they hate the commentary, often it can be translated to "They didn't dickride the fighter I wanted to win".

Commentators are biased. I've grown to accept that, despite that it can be very annoying. I'm sure in most cases, their bosses tell them which fighter's butt they should sniff. It has no bearing on the judge's scorecards and it doesn't affect my own scoring.

[RetroSpeed05]

When people say they hate the commentary, often it can be translated to "They didn't dickride the fighter I wanted to win".

Commentators are biased. I've grown to accept that, despite that it can be very annoying. I'm sure in most cases, their bosses tell them which fighter's butt they should sniff. It has no bearing on the judge's scorecards and it doesn't affect my own scoring.

All i know is Bradly gave Pedraza his due while also saying things like watch out Loma always goes to his right watch what Pedraza gonna do or time that. When Pedraza wasn't doing anything yet. Bradley sounded the opposite of bias. In fact some spots sounded almost against Loma.