Comments Thread For: Sanchez: Golovkin Has 2-3 Years Left, I'd Like 5 or 6 Fights

[aboutfkntime]

I see you’re locked into another argument about ggg...big surprise there lol. “Pitty pat jab”...yea cuz that’s what ggg has.😂

Sanchez wanted Golovkin to grow some balls and fight Canelo

far too often..... Golovkin either waited, or hesitated

he would not commit because of how sharp Canelo was

that hesitant, pushed, pitty-pat jab..... just let Canelo off the hook

[Real King Kong]

Sanchez wanted Golovkin to grow some balls and fight Canelo

far too often..... Golovkin either waited, or hesitated

he would not commit because of how sharp Canelo was

that hesitant, pushed, pitty-pat jab..... just let Canelo off the hook

Wow...1 gif. I’m now convinced ggg has a “pitty-pat jab”.

[TonyGe]

Wow...1 gif. I’m now convinced ggg has a “pitty-pat jab”.

Pretty sure a punch to the hip is illegal. That one looked a bit low.

[aboutfkntime]

Wow...1 gif. I’m now convinced ggg has a “pitty-pat jab”.

the official scoring criteria are.....

* clean hard punching
* effective aggression
* ring generalship
* defence

1) which of those scoring criteria covers pitty-pat jabs ?

2) which of those scoring criteria did Golovkin win ?

[aboutfkntime]

Pretty sure a punch to the hip is illegal. That one looked a bit low.

pretty sure that you are ducking the same question today, that you ducked yesterday.....

the official scoring criteria are.....

* clean hard punching
* effective aggression
* ring generalship
* defence

1) which of those scoring criteria covers pitty-pat jabs ?

2) which of those scoring criteria did Golovkin win ?

[Real King Kong]

the official scoring criteria are.....

* clean hard punching
* effective aggression
* ring generalship
* defence

1) which of those scoring criteria covers pitty-pat jabs ?

2) which of those scoring criteria did Golovkin win ?

Saying ggg’s jab is “pitty pat” just makes you look like a hater who shouldn’t be taken seriously...which is true lol. He’s considered to have one of the best jabs in boxing.

[aboutfkntime]

Saying ggg’s jab is “pitty pat” just makes you look like a hater who shouldn’t be taken seriously...which is true lol. He’s considered to have one of the best jabs in boxing.

ignoring the obvious point, makes you look like an excuse-making fanboy

here, let me remove your excuse, fanboy.....

the official scoring criteria are.....

* clean hard punching
* effective aggression
* ring generalship
* defence

1) which of those scoring criteria covers jabs ?

jabs, you know..... the punches that were not nearly as effective as Canelo's clean hard combinations and counters

2) which of those scoring criteria did Golovkin win ?

is there still sufficient justification for you to ignore the point, or do I need to remove another excuse for you?

[Real King Kong]

ignoring the obvious point, makes you look like an excuse-making fanboy

here, let me remove your excuse, fanboy.....

the official scoring criteria are.....

* clean hard punching
* effective aggression
* ring generalship
* defence

1) which of those scoring criteria covers jabs ?

jabs, you know..... the punches that were not nearly as effective as Canelo's clean hard combinations and counters

2) which of those scoring criteria did Golovkin win ?

is there still sufficient justification for you to ignore the point, or do I need to remove another excuse for you?

This is the obvious point of the thread? Or just some autistic tangent you’ve gone off on?

[aboutfkntime]

Saying ggg’s jab is “pitty pat” just makes you look like a hater who shouldn’t be taken seriously...which is true lol. He’s considered to have one of the best jabs in boxing.

btw, your " pitty-pat " excuse..... is not as bad as your "hater" excuse

hate is worthless and can easily be discredited

right ?

* clean hard punching
* effective aggression
* ring generalship
* defence

effective aggression, and clean hard punching..... OBVIOUSLY went to Canelo..... he backed-up Golovkin and lumped him up with TONS of judge-friendly combinations and counters

defence..... OBVIOUSLY went to Canelo

ring generalship..... one guy fought his fight, and the other guy did not..... ring generalship OBVIOUSLY went to the guy who controlled the fight and got his game going.....

there is nothing to moan and cry about regarding the rematch

even Sanchez admitted that he wanted Golovkin to stop backing up and fight Canelo

[aboutfkntime]

This is the obvious point of the thread? Or just some autistic tangent you’ve gone off on?

you provided an excuse.....

Saying ggg’s jab is “pitty pat” just makes you look.....

so I removed your excuse.....

* clean hard punching
* effective aggression
* ring generalship
* defence

1) which of those scoring criteria covers jabs ?

jabs, you know..... the punches that were not nearly as effective as Canelo's clean hard combinations and counters

2) which of those scoring criteria did Golovkin win ?

let me know which of those questions were too hard