lomachenko needs to retire
Collapse
-
-
lol you can easily say that the 5 yr pro thing is a way to spin it too, most guys dont wait til 25 to turn proComment
-
Of course it does. How else can we compare. He is 30, Floyd is 30. You are giving Loma a pass for not turning pro until he was 25.
In his 1st 5 years Floyd was 25-0 and had 6 defenses of his lineal title and a win over 33-0 Corrales. Of course he was 19-24 years old. That is the reason you want to gerrymander it. OK, lets look at it the gerrymandered way to give Loma the best possible chance.
From age 25-30 Floyd was 11-0. Titles in 4 divisions, lineal in 2 divisions, unified in 1 division. Compare that to Loma's 11-1, titles in 3 divisions, no lineal titles and unified in 1 division.
Your statement is exaggerated based on the facts. Perhaps its the exaggeration that annoys Floyd fans.Comment
-
Go check the threads. For example, when the ******ed narrative was Brook exposed GGG, I was the person saying that is ridiculous. Same with Kov/Ward 1, where I had Kov winning. This despite the fact I don't like either guy.Yet you perpetrate it and attack fans of white fighters or people you perceive as white and say nothing of ridiculous criticisms of european fighters but if someone criticizes a certain black fighter or heaven forbid Floyd you go on the full on defensive and point the finger.
You try and act above it but many posters see right through it.
This past weekend with Loma, I credited him with winning a fight clear and pointed out winning a tougher than expected fight is ok and a sign of is greatness.
As for black fighters, who is more critical of Wilder than me? I was just in here calling out Tank debating with boxingisgreat.
You can always go verify my comments in the threads. It's not about pretending to be above anything. I go in the muck with you guys often.
He unified with zab before that. But that was the same division so you are correct.Last edited by The Big Dunn; 12-10-2018, 12:49 PM.Comment
-
Comment
-
He didn't unify with Zab. That was only for one belt as Zab lost the others the fight prior and Floyd didn't have a belt at that point.Go check the threads. For example, when the ******ed narrative was Brook exposed GGG, I was the person saying that is ridiculous. Same with Kov/Ward 1, where I had Kov winning. This despite the fact I don't like either guy.
This past weekend with Loma, I credited him with winning a fight clear and pointed out winning a tougher than expected fight is ok and a sign of is greatness.
As for black fighters, who is more critical of Wilder than me? I was just in here calling out Tank debating with boxingisgreat.
You can always go verify my comments in the threads. It's not about pretending to be above anything. I go in the muck with you guys often.
He unified with zab before that. But that was the same division so you are correct.Comment
-
Comment
-
Yeah, minus the lack of defense where he looked like he was in a totaled car wreck with a non puncher. Yeah, I’d say he’s done lmao.Comment
-
Not all fighters turn pro at the same age. That's why what you're saying is a spin. We are judging their careers as pro fighters.If you want to compare their achievements by the time they turned 30, we might as well start counting their amateur careers, and I don't think you wanna go there.Of course it does. How else can we compare. He is 30, Floyd is 30. You are giving Loma a pass for not turning pro until he was 25.
In his 1st 5 years Floyd was 25-0 and had 6 defenses of his lineal title and a win over 33-0 Corrales. Of course he was 19-24 years old. That is the reason you want to gerrymander it. OK, lets look at it the gerrymandered way to give Loma the best possible chance.
From age 25-30 Floyd was 11-0. Titles in 4 divisions, lineal in 2 divisions, unified in 1 division. Compare that to Loma's 11-1, titles in 3 divisions, no lineal titles and unified in 1 division.
Your statement is exaggerated based on the facts. Perhaps its the exaggeration that annoys Floyd fans.Comment
.
Comment