Hahaha the entire boxing community outside of Matchroom seems to be echoing this statement. No wonder Eddie and AJ bashed Fury/Wilder every chance they could, and now they have to watch it again!!
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: Arum: Wilder-Fury Was Tremendous - Joshua is Number 3!
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by Eff Pandas View PostWho kidnapped the real Bob Arum?
Holy f#ck man Bob don't not throw shade on PBC ever I thought.
I didn’t put too much stock in the statement originally, but he’s really proved himself. Also him walking away from Pac the second he started talking rematch was a big statement IMO. Bob could have milked that for MILLIONS and instead he said that it was bad for boxing and wanted nothing to do with it.
And keep in mind, to whomever is going to read this and call me out, I bash every promoter, I’m not sticking up for Bob. I am not a top rank schill.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Jkp View Post***ellery bought by eddie doesnt make you #1.
I dont even know what half of those belts AJ carries around are for. Maybe a belt for biggest ducker?
Funny that, i suppose you only recognize one title in this weight. Through all the divisions its unified champion, at heavy its just trinkets bought by a promoter.
I dont know why some of you goons refuse to see Joshua as the number 1 when every single fact thats has been a solid argument for other Boxers for years. Saltiness makes it hard to move on this forum.
Not that it matters, be as salty as you want. Joshua is number 1.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Thebrownbear View PostWow. AJ does not do pay per view. A Wilder-Fury card in Vegas or the UK will be huge box office pay per view. If it happens in the UK, AJ will be completely overshadowed. Wilder and Fury will make tons of money fighting twice more with both of them making more money fighting AJ after. They really don't need him at this point.
As for your argument Wilder Fury will make loads in rematches and put Joshua in the shadows, good for them, lets see. But once again we are back to the old Wilder arguments of he WOULD and he COULD. We still are saying those things not he IS and we cant say that cuz so for in 41 fights he HASNT.
Comment
-
Originally posted by DaNeutral. View PostI dont even know what that means? AJ does not do PPV? Well thats a surprise to me cuz ive had to pay PPV for many of his fight.
As for your argument Wilder Fury will make loads in rematches and put Joshua in the shadows, good for them, lets see. But once again we are back to the old Wilder arguments of he WOULD and he COULD. We still are saying those things not he IS and we cant say that cuz so for in 41 fights he HASNT.
Comment
-
Originally posted by DaNeutral. View PostFunny that, i suppose you only recognize one title in this weight. Through all the divisions its unified champion, at heavy its just trinkets bought by a promoter.
I dont know why some of you goons refuse to see Joshua as the number 1 when every single fact thats has been a solid argument for other Boxers for years. Saltiness makes it hard to move on this forum.
Not that it matters, be as salty as you want. Joshua is number 1.
Comment
-
Yawn.... One of these 2 (preferably Wilder for the undisputed status) sign on to fight Joshua on the April 19 PPV, then prove you are number 1.
Jesus Christ, if I was in their shoes I'd be jumping at that chance - career high pay-day and 3 more world championship belts to fight someone they both call a bum and a coward? Where's the problem? Swallow your pride, accept being the B side for one fight, stop grasping for even more money than what would be a record pay-day and get the hell on with it. There'll even be a re-match clause if they beat him (if it's Wilder, probably a 2 fight deal regardless) so then they'd easily break the limit on their next career high pay-day.
Comment
Comment