Irrefutable proof! There was no long count!

[Superbee]

That wide view video shows even more how close Wilder was to shut off the lights... after Fury got up he gets a left hook that shook him again and the right hand barely missed right after... that shot would have flatten Fury for good...

[Raggamuffin]

You guys can act like Fury won but it was a draw and a rematch is in order. You didn’t pick Fury or believe in him and now you’re all going out of your way to say he won lmao. Foh lol...

[AL_Camino]

You guys can act like Fury won but it was a draw and a rematch is in order. You didn’t pick Fury or believe in him and now you’re all going out of your way to say he won lmao. Foh lol...

Because he did win. It isnt rocket science. Wilder gave away too many rounds. Fury won by points. But some people just cant be neutral and are fanboying hard.

[Raggamuffin]

Because he did win. It isnt rocket science. Wilder gave away too many rounds. Fury won by points. But some people just cant be neutral and are fanboying hard.

No, they’re crying like they did after the first GG and Canelo fight and the first Kov and Ward fight. Crying won’t change the verdict. Rematches normally solve everything.

[chrisJS]

No, they’re crying like they did after the first GG and Canelo fight and the first Kov and Ward fight. Crying won’t change the verdict. Rematches normally solve everything.

You admitted you scored for Fury though, right?

Some "draws" or "wins" end up without re-matches and are B.S.

Whitaker-Chavez comes to mind. Does that sit well with you as a "draw"? I, like everyone just counts that as a Whitaker win.

Was it fair Tyrone Everrett "lost" to Alfredo Escalera? Or Richar Abril against Brandon Rios?

Even some B.S draws don't end up being righted. Is it fair that Jeff Fenech got robbed against Azumah Nelson because he lost a re-match? Nelson proved to be better but it's unfair Fenech didn't get the official win and the new title that would have came with it.

Sometimes like Lewis-Holyfield, Pacquaio-Bradley, Marquez-Pacquaio it's righted but sometimes official decisions are so bad they can't be justified. Boxing is the most pre-meditated and corrupted sport there is and a lot of the time it's too convenient to hide behind the official (though grossly incorrect) decision.

[NYG]

No, they’re crying like they did after the first GG and Canelo fight and the first Kov and Ward fight. Crying won’t change the verdict. Rematches normally solve everything.

The point is, the fight doesn't need a ****ing rematch you idiot and neither did the others. It's all about money so rematches help make money but at least try to be a man for once in your life and be honest.

If you don't think Fury won, you're a ****ing jerkoff or a troll, or both, i go with both. Fury clearly outboxed him and i don't give a **** about knockdowns when those are basically the only 2 rounds Wilder won. Since when does knockdowns give you a draw/win when you got ouboxed for the other 9-10 rounds?

[Raggamuffin]

You admitted you scored for Fury though, right?

Some "draws" or "wins" end up without re-matches and are B.S.

Whitaker-Chavez comes to mind. Does that sit well with you as a "draw"? I, like everyone just counts that as a Whitaker win.

Was it fair Tyrone Everrett "lost" to Alfredo Escalera? Or Richar Abril against Brandon Rios?

Even some B.S draws don't end up being righted. Is it fair that Jeff Fenech got robbed against Azumah Nelson because he lost a re-match? Nelson proved to be better but it's unfair Fenech didn't get the official win and the new title that would have came with it.

Sometimes like Lewis-Holyfield, Pacquaio-Bradley, Marquez-Pacquaio it's righted but sometimes official decisions are so bad they can't be justified. Boxing is the most pre-meditated and corrupted sport there is and a lot of the time it's too convenient to hide behind the official (though grossly incorrect) decision.

I don’t get your point. Did you give Fury 10 rounds? I’m asking, seriously.

[Raggamuffin]

The point is, the fight doesn't need a ****ing rematch you idiot and neither did the others. It's all about money so rematches help make money but at least try to be a man for once in your life and be honest.

If you don't think Fury won, you're a ****ing jerkoff or a troll, or both, i go with both. Fury clearly outboxed him and i don't give a **** about knockdowns when those are basically the only 2 rounds Wilder won. Since when does knockdowns give you a draw/win when you got ouboxed for the other 9-10 rounds?

Fighters do rematches. And we don’t care what ****less trolls like you think. I had Fury winning by a point motherr****er and I know that this fight needs a rematch. And you mofos who say Fury won 9-10 rounds don’t need to watch boxing anymore. Sick ****s, lmao.

[chrisJS]

I don’t get your point. Did you give Fury 10 rounds? I’m asking, seriously.

My point is that official scores can and often are wrong and sometimes a re-match doesn't correct them. Were you cool with Chavez and Whitaker being a draw?

I gave Fury 10 rounds, yes. I can see a case for someone thinking Wilder won 3 though. 10-2 is a more common card than 7-5 so I feel good about it.

I score on clean punches, effective aggression, ring generalship and defense.

[SN!PER]

The #1 and #2 heavyweights fought to a DRAW.

One of them was within ONE SECOND of being knocked out.

The PPV made a lot of money and the fans want a sequel to the story.

These two deserve a rematch more than any other active fighters in boxing.