Lets make one thing clear, ggg beat canelo twice.....

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Madison Boxing
    Banned
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Jul 2015
    • 35364
    • 6,455
    • 3,367
    • 190,590

    #1

    Lets make one thing clear, ggg beat canelo twice.....

    Quit revising the second fight and pretending he lost. The stats dont back it up and he lost just as clear as he did in the first fight if u score it round by round. Canelo got outboxed by the 'crude european caveman'... but lets give canelo the 'i came forward and threw some body shots' belt... thats the only thing he won cause he sure as **** didnt win either fight
  • muslimer12
    Undisputed Champion
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Mar 2013
    • 1049
    • 41
    • 19
    • 15,320

    #2
    Yup.......

    Comment

    • sunny31
      Undisputed Champion
      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
      • Feb 2006
      • 5780
      • 450
      • 35
      • 128,703

      #3
      I'm not sure he won either to be honest, both drawish type fights. Scored the first 7-5 Golovkin and second fight a draw, but would not argue 7-5 Golovkin for that one either.

      The problem with these fights was that in reality, emotions to one side, of the 24 rounds, 18 could have been subjectively scored either way. Of the 6 remaining Golovkin probably had 4 dominant rounds and Canelo 2. So out of 24 rounds Golovkin only had 4 dominant rounds that's the problem with your theory. There is a general thought that GGG swept rounds 4-9 in the first fight for example, but some of those rounds were mighty close.

      In terms of round scoring they were closer fights than Wilder Fury that's for sure. People are trying to be creative with the scoring because of the knockdowns, but had those not happened people would be saying it was a shut out or maybe Wilder won a couple of rounds

      Comment

      • DuckAdonis
        Undisputed Champion
        Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
        • Jul 2017
        • 7775
        • 197
        • 84
        • 188,446

        #4
        Scored it both 7-5 Golovkin but if I'm honest GGG really didn't try to win the 2nd one as much as the first...it looked like Nelo had the momentum so I'm not that mad at the decision. Definitely not no Wilder vs Fury type of Robbery where one guy got completely schooled.

        Comment

        • kidbazooka
          Banned
          Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
          • Dec 2015
          • 10062
          • 278
          • 2
          • 133,405

          #5
          Damn drama that lose hit you hard huh?

          Canelo will forever be gggs daddy now.

          Comment

          • R-Hand Southpaw
            Undisputed Champion
            Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
            • Dec 2017
            • 2342
            • 199
            • 32
            • 58,647

            #6
            Originally posted by sunny31
            I'm not sure he won either to be honest, both drawish type fights. Scored the first 7-5 Golovkin and second fight a draw, but would not argue 7-5 Golovkin for that one either.

            The problem with these fights was that in reality, emotions to one side, of the 24 rounds, 18 could have been subjectively scored either way. Of the 6 remaining Golovkin probably had 4 dominant rounds and Canelo 2. So out of 24 rounds Golovkin only had 4 dominant rounds that's the problem with your theory. There is a general thought that GGG swept rounds 4-9 in the first fight for example, but some of those rounds were mighty close.

            In terms of round scoring they were closer fights than Wilder Fury that's for sure. People are trying to be creative with the scoring because of the knockdowns, but had those not happened people would be saying it was a shut out or maybe Wilder won a couple of rounds
            Imo, most GGG fans here are pretty objective compared to the Canelo fans. They think Canelo won both fights in a landslide while most GGG fans can say GGG easily won the first but the 2nd was much closer.

            I personally scored both fights 7-5 GGG.

            The first fight I could not see a draw period. Blatant robbery. The second fight could have been a draw.

            It's funny too because you look at half the Canelo fans they think Fury won even though the only punch he threw was a jab yet somehow against canelo jabs all of a sudden didnt count as a punch. Only body shots counted. They say anything to make their case just like the "creative " wilder fanboys.

            Comment

            • sunny31
              Undisputed Champion
              Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
              • Feb 2006
              • 5780
              • 450
              • 35
              • 128,703

              #7
              Originally posted by Socialtwinkie
              Imo, most GGG fans here are pretty objective compared to the Canelo fans. They think Canelo won both fights in a landslide while most GGG fans can say GGG easily won the first but the 2nd was much closer.

              I personally scored both fights 7-5 GGG.

              The first fight I could not see a draw period. Blatant robbery. The second fight could have been a draw.

              It's funny too because you look at half the Canelo fans they think Fury won even though the only punch he threw was a jab yet somehow against canelo jabs all of a sudden didnt count as a punch. Only body shots counted. They say anything to make their case just like the "creative " wilder fanboys.
              Most of that is posturing and arguing by two sets of fans tbh I don't pay too much attention. I could see a draw if you give Canelo 1-3 and 10-12 which was not impossible a few Canelo def won, the rest were close. I haven't watched it in a while granted

              Disagree slightly with the Last part because one was a low contact fight for the most part so the jab does become more of a difference maker in the scoring and the other one was more normal both fighters taking and giving and landing a lot of power.

              Comment

              • JohnCastellanos
                Undisputed Champion
                Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                • Apr 2018
                • 2800
                • 127
                • 184
                • 125,754

                #8
                Originally posted by DuckAdonis
                Scored it both 7-5 Golovkin but if I'm honest GGG really didn't try to win the 2nd one as much as the first...it looked like Nelo had the momentum so I'm not that mad at the decision. Definitely not no Wilder vs Fury type of Robbery where one guy got completely schooled.
                Looking back it’s disgusting how much shet you clowns gave Canelo! You literally acted as if it was the biggest robbery of the century! It took seeing a real robbery for you guys to even warm up to the fact that the first fight was close and could have went to either fighter! As much as I love Tyson Fury im glad he got robbed just so you people could see how unfair you were to Canelo

                Comment

                • mcdonalds
                  Undisputed Champion
                  • Oct 2017
                  • 3700
                  • 298
                  • 11
                  • 106,172

                  #9
                  It's been 3 months and you're still in the denial stage?

                  Image result for stages of grief
                  Last edited by mcdonalds; 12-05-2018, 07:17 PM.

                  Comment

                  • bigdunny1
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                    • Mar 2015
                    • 14762
                    • 382
                    • 2
                    • 167,136

                    #10
                    Still crying I see. his own trainer told him that he was losing. Then after the fight his own trainer not only doubled down on that claim but said this

                    Originally posted by Motorcity Cobra







                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP