No (mandatory) Rematch

[johnbook]

HaHa
He's saying there is no rematch clause because it was a draw.

https://********/O_iF8NJW8EU

Like Eubanks and Don King.
Win or lose vs Benn II, Chris Eubanks would have been owned by King he revealed.
The draw wasn't in the contract and he celebrated being free from that.

[Sun_Tzu]

I wondered my self if there was a clause in the case of a draw.

[johnbook]

I wondered my self if there was a clause in the case of a draw.

Nope.
Look for the story about Eubanks draw with Benn
II.
He later said win or lose, he was gonna be owned by King. Celebrated the rest of his career because he didn't want that.

Someone here screwed the pooch again by leaving that possibility out.
Both free to fight AJ or whoever.
Of course a rematch might still be the best option for both.

Fury's handler's better be tough with him. Something about a rematch drives him to drink and...