Tyson Fury confirms there was a two way rematch clause.

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Robbie Barrett
    Banned
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Nov 2013
    • 40891
    • 2,779
    • 667
    • 570,921

    #1

    Tyson Fury confirms there was a two way rematch clause.

    @1:40





    So there was never going to be Wilder fighting Joshua in April. What do you have to say about that Wilder fans?
  • Robbie Barrett
    Banned
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Nov 2013
    • 40891
    • 2,779
    • 667
    • 570,921

    #2
    Why did Wilders team not tell the fans and were leading everyone to believe they didn't have a 2 way rematch clause? Wilders fans are gullible as ****. Played you all for fools.

    Comment

    • LoadedWraps
      Official NSB POTY 2016
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Nov 2010
      • 24267
      • 1,021
      • 1,468
      • 190,165

      #3
      Don't nobody tell Yusaf Mack the clause goes both ways.

      [IMG]https://media.*****.com/media/11aitZSSRhHYuQ/*****-downsized-large.gif[/IMG]

      Comment

      • KTFOKING
        Undisputed Champion
        Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
        • Jun 2018
        • 14399
        • 1,266
        • 284
        • 344,781

        #4
        If there is a two way rematch clause, why does Warren want WBC to order the rematch? Weird, because that wouldn't be necessary if there is a rematch clause right?

        Either way, the rematch should be happening next.

        Comment

        • Robbie Barrett
          Banned
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Nov 2013
          • 40891
          • 2,779
          • 667
          • 570,921

          #5
          Originally posted by KTFOKING
          If there is a two way rematch clause, why does Warren want WBC to order the rematch? Weird, because that wouldn't be necessary if there is a rematch clause right?

          Either way, the rematch should be happening next.
          Because the rematch clause doesn't cover a draw. They rarely do, same thing with Canelo-Golovkin.

          Comment

          • KTFOKING
            Undisputed Champion
            Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
            • Jun 2018
            • 14399
            • 1,266
            • 284
            • 344,781

            #6
            Originally posted by Robbie Barrett
            Because the rematch clause doesn't cover a draw. They rarely do, same thing with Canelo-Golovkin.
            If there is a two way rematch clause you pretty much are agreeing to run it back either way, no? Something isn't adding up here.

            Wasn't Canelo the only one with a rematch clause vs GGG? Or did it go both ways?

            Comment

            • A.K
              Undisputed Champion
              Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
              • May 2014
              • 11052
              • 280
              • 79
              • 71,066

              #7
              Originally posted by Robbie Barrett
              Why did Wilders team not tell the fans and were leading everyone to believe they didn't have a 2 way rematch clause? Wilders fans are gullible as ****. Played you all for fools.
              Played you cause you are a fool I’ve known this hell they even said it on showtime before the fight you bozo.

              Comment

              • Robbie Barrett
                Banned
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Nov 2013
                • 40891
                • 2,779
                • 667
                • 570,921

                #8
                Originally posted by KTFOKING
                If there is a two way rematch clause you pretty much are agreeing to run it back either way, no? Something isn't adding up here.

                Wasn't Canelo the only one with a rematch clause vs GGG? Or did it go both ways?
                2 way rematch clause forces a rematch if the loser wants it. A draw there is no loser, both need to agree to a rematch.

                Comment

                • A.K
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                  • May 2014
                  • 11052
                  • 280
                  • 79
                  • 71,066

                  #9
                  Originally posted by Robbie Barrett
                  2 way rematch clause forces a rematch if the loser wants it. A draw there is no loser, both need to agree to a rematch.
                  Ok so basically your post is total “rubbish” then since it’s still up to the coward to sign

                  Comment

                  • Robbie Barrett
                    Banned
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • Nov 2013
                    • 40891
                    • 2,779
                    • 667
                    • 570,921

                    #10
                    Originally posted by A.K
                    Ok so basically your post is total “rubbish” then since it’s still up to the coward to sign
                    How is it rubbish? Did Wilders team know the fight would be a draw before they signed?

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP