Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Naazim Richardson said Wilder won, should he train Wilder for rematch?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Naazim Richardson said Wilder won, should he train Wilder for rematch?

    Wilder was looking like he needed a new trainer. Luis Ortiz was outboxing him before the stoppage, and Fury was outboxing him even easier.

    Would Wilder be much improved with Naazim Richardson?

  • #2
    well if naazim watched that fight and thought wilder won then thats not the type of guy you need training you for a rematch

    Comment


    • #3
      Mark Breland is a better trainer for Wilder Naiz would make the Fury win much easier this time

      Comment


      • #4
        He also called Wilder the best HW puncher in history and always speak highly of Wilder. So am not shocked that he thinks Wilder won.

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by South Champion View Post
          Wilder was looking like he needed a new trainer. Luis Ortiz was outboxing him before the stoppage, and Fury was outboxing him even easier.

          Would Wilder be much improved with Naazim Richardson?
          ****m is a confirmed racist, always picking the black fighter. He's not even a good trainer. Name me one guy he's ever had that's NOT Hopkins that was good and he did big things with?

          Don't bring up Mosely either, Shane brought him in for the Margarito fight which was pretty close to the end.

          Notable fighters trained or advised by Richardson:
          Bernard Hopkins
          Shane Mosley (Came in at Margarito)
          Karl Dargan - Nephew of Naazim Richardson.
          Badr Hari
          Yusaf Mack (Worked corner)
          Sergio Martinez (Corner adviser for fight vs. Julio Cesar Chavez, Jr.)
          Steve Cunningham

          Richardson is a nobody.

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by Ray* View Post
            He also called Wilder the best HW puncher in history and always speak highly of Wilder. So am not shocked that he thinks Wilder won.
            I don't know about being the biggest puncher in HW history, but definitely one of the best punchers ever. Dude has dynamite in his hands.

            Comment


            • #7
              No. He hasn't shown to be anything special as a trainer. Hopkins is his claim to fame. Who else has he done well with? In the opinion of most viewers Wilder lost.

              Comment


              • #8
                Naazim has never liked Fury since Fury was being Fury in the Cunningham press conference and then smashed Cunningham in the ring like he said he would

                "Steve Cunningham, the whole of Philadelphia and every man in it couldn't be me, together"

                Fury rant from about 4.30

                Last edited by EasternEuroFan; 12-03-2018, 08:32 PM.

                Comment


                • #9
                  He was the first person that came to mind when people asked if wilder should switch trainers

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    He is lying
                    He knew Fury won.

                    There is a post fight interview where he tries to explain it away by saying I was judging like they were going to judge it having Fury ahead

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X
                    TOP