When he beat the legendary Luis Ortiz a great young buck in his own right this place was full of folks saying he’d beat Louis, Lewis, Holyfield, Tyson, Holmes and Foreman. I was laughed at for suggesting Holmes had better skill.
His amazing achievement in beating a god in Stiverne and a top 5 all-time in Ortiz had seemingly propelled him to #1 or 2 all-time but then last night he got his **** pushed in by a drug addict who’d lost 150 plus pounds and had three years off. I mean I was told he had more skill than Lomachenko but he looked clueless last night against a guy still shaking off rust.
Is it fair to say he was overrated and he’s indeed a terrible fighter? I think it’s clear now people fell for the hype.
His amazing achievement in beating a god in Stiverne and a top 5 all-time in Ortiz had seemingly propelled him to #1 or 2 all-time but then last night he got his **** pushed in by a drug addict who’d lost 150 plus pounds and had three years off. I mean I was told he had more skill than Lomachenko but he looked clueless last night against a guy still shaking off rust.
Is it fair to say he was overrated and he’s indeed a terrible fighter? I think it’s clear now people fell for the hype.
Comment