Wilder was never going to lose that fight. FIX WAS IN

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • The Gambler1981
    Undisputed Champion
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • May 2008
    • 25961
    • 521
    • 774
    • 49,039

    #11
    Originally posted by satiev1
    You're not getting my point. The judges would have changed their cards to a accomodate a draw no matter what.

    You don't know that, they guy that scored it 7-5 for Wilder had Wilder winning the early rounds. He was favoring Wilder's aggression because while Fury was boxing well he was inactive for long stretches and not doing that much punching. If someone was going to have Wilder ahead I could at least see their argument, it would be a tough argument to win but you could try.

    As the fight wore on he was giving Fury more credit because he was doing more with his advantages.

    Straight up the British judge would have had Fury winning without the knockdown in the 12th so he had Fury ahead going in.

    So that is a really convenient argument to make because it can't be proven and it can change if needed.

    Comment

    • Luilun
      Undisputed Champion
      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
      • Dec 2010
      • 12457
      • 555
      • 94
      • 58,436

      #12
      Yea I agree the only way Fury was going to win was by knock out , he's not a knock out guy he's a skills guy kind of like Mayweather

      Comment

      Working...
      TOP