1st thru 4th round were all debatable. No one dominated or landed any hard, telling shot. I do agree fury dominated most of the fight, but the 2 knockdowns can't go unnoticed. Fury by 1 or draw was honestly fine with me.
Comments Thread For: Deontay Wilder vs. Tyson Fury - Official Scorecards - Photo
Collapse
-
-
I figured this. Even Mr. FIomo himself Floyd said Fury was up 5-0 hahahah. Nice try, you POS Loser.Comment
-
1st round was debatable. 2 to 4 were really not. None of the other two judges or any un-official score cards gave them to Wilder.
2 to 4 Wilder missed a lot of shots with Fury just moving out of the way, making him look very amateurish. People can discuss all the other rounds but those 3 rounds were as clear cut as clear cut get's.Comment
-
Lol wtf. How am I a POS loser because you think wilder lost? Lol only loser is you for even commenting that. Anyways, we all know Floyd is a defensive fighter. Who do you think he was pulling for? I let you guess that, ******Last edited by chepboxingking; 12-02-2018, 02:20 AM.Comment
-
I agree, wilder looked amateurish 2-4, but what exactly did fury do these rounds? He barely threw any punches. Because wilder is this one-punch knockout fighter, he doesn't get credit for getting those short, in between shots in. He made fury nose bleed in the 4th. Can't do that if your not landing.1st round was debatable. 2 to 4 were really not. None of the other two judges or any un-official score cards gave them to Wilder.
2 to 4 Wilder missed a lot of shots with Fury just moving out of the way, making him look very amateurish. People can discuss all the other rounds but those 3 rounds were as clear cut as clear cut get's.Comment
-
I did not. I had the fight as a draw at the end or Wilder up by 1 round. I watched the 1st 4 rounds and gave each fighter 2 a piece. So, even if I gave Tyson the remaining close rounds, it is still a draw. I don't listen to commentary when Fury isn't doing anything. Even in a rematch, people will credit Fury for making Wilder miss when he wasn't doing anything most of the 1st 4 rounds.Comment
-
So making someone miss without doing much yourself should win you the rounds, right? That's the problem here. Wilder was the aggressor and controlled the ring for those 4 rounds.1st round was debatable. 2 to 4 were really not. None of the other two judges or any un-official score cards gave them to Wilder.
2 to 4 Wilder missed a lot of shots with Fury just moving out of the way, making him look very amateurish. People can discuss all the other rounds but those 3 rounds were as clear cut as clear cut get's.Comment
-
Exactly. That's the problem Wilder won 1st and 4th at least for me. Every judge had Wilder winning the 1st. Now I think the 2nd was close and so was the 3rd but it could have gone either way. One judge gave all to Fury while the other gave all to Wilder. There goes the scores....I agree, wilder looked amateurish 2-4, but what exactly did fury do these rounds? He barely threw any punches. Because wilder is this one-punch knockout fighter, he doesn't get credit for getting those short, in between shots in. He made fury nose bleed in the 4th. Can't do that if your not landing.Comment
-
-
7 rounds, gave the entire first 1/3 of the fight to wilder. Clean sweep spotted Wilder a 4-0 start. Total mockery of the sport. Wilder was missing at a historic rate. Finished landing just 17% of his punches outlanded in EVERY boxing statistic power punches, jabs ect. If he wasn't paid off I have no other explaination for his card. And I was rooting for wilder lolComment
Comment